31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

matters of ecclesiastical discipl<strong>in</strong>e, Damasus would do it for him. The petition also<br />

asked that Damasus, if he were to have such authority over his equals should not be<br />

judged by <strong>the</strong>m, and that <strong>in</strong>stead he should be tried by <strong>the</strong> emperor himself ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

<strong>the</strong> Church courts. 265<br />

The letter was a severe dress<strong>in</strong>g down for Aquil<strong>in</strong>us for his apparent failure to<br />

take action aga<strong>in</strong>st religious dissidents <strong>in</strong> Rome and also aga<strong>in</strong>st o<strong>the</strong>r officials <strong>in</strong> Italy<br />

who had apparently failed <strong>in</strong> this account. Gratian accused Aquilianus of try<strong>in</strong>g his<br />

patience by disregard<strong>in</strong>g his orders and thus allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dissidents <strong>in</strong> Rome to<br />

flourish. 266 Gratian also questioned whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Urs<strong>in</strong>ians were effectively more<br />

powerful than he was <strong>in</strong> Rome. 267 Despite this implied threat to his authority, Gratian<br />

simply cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>the</strong> policy of Valent<strong>in</strong>ian and ordered that <strong>the</strong>y should be expelled to<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> one hundredth milestone from Rome.<br />

Gratian appears to depart from <strong>the</strong> normal and accepted means of perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Imperial bus<strong>in</strong>ess by tell<strong>in</strong>g Aquil<strong>in</strong>us that he would not issue any fur<strong>the</strong>r legislation<br />

on <strong>the</strong> issue and that Aquil<strong>in</strong>us should read <strong>the</strong> orders Gratian had sent to his<br />

predecessor Simplicius “and cease to expect a repetition of <strong>the</strong> mandate, because our<br />

Clemency’s propriety should disda<strong>in</strong> to repeat an <strong>in</strong>struction.” 268 Possibly Gratian<br />

decided this was a more efficient means of execut<strong>in</strong>g government bus<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>in</strong> which<br />

case he would have been presag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> motivations for <strong>the</strong> Theodosian Code itself by<br />

almost fifty years. He, and his government may also have thought that such a<br />

procedural change would make <strong>the</strong> government appear more powerful because<br />

whatever it decided would be permanent. But whatever <strong>the</strong> motivations, this change<br />

may well have rendered <strong>the</strong> government less powerful by mak<strong>in</strong>g it less prevalent<br />

265 Damasus’ petition is at PL.13.575-584, Stevenson (1966) 89-91 provides a translation.<br />

266 nostra praecepta per v estram neglegentiam destituta quae tan dem poterit ferre patientia? Quam quidem<br />

dum despicitis excitatis, ut longae tolerantiae desperatos sum at accentus et officium m etu cogat agnosci<br />

267 etiam ne v iv idius est, quod Urs<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>v ssit am entia, quam quod serenitas nostra m itibus persuasit edictis<br />

268 Flavius Simplicius 7 PLRE 1.844; et des<strong>in</strong>at iteration em sperare m andati, quia pigendus m ansuetud<strong>in</strong>is<br />

nostrae pudor est <strong>in</strong>staurare praeceptum<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!