31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

forbidden by no law.” As such, Theodosius was “gravely disturbed that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

assemblies have been forbidden <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> places.” Addeus was <strong>the</strong>refore ordered to<br />

“restra<strong>in</strong> with proper severity <strong>the</strong> excesses of those persons who, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong><br />

Christian religion, presume to commit certa<strong>in</strong> unlawful acts and attempt to destroy<br />

and to despoil <strong>the</strong> synagogues.” 269<br />

On religious violence <strong>in</strong> Theodosius' reign Brown has written that events such<br />

as those at Call<strong>in</strong>icum are noticeable precisely because <strong>the</strong>y ‘stand out’ as unusual, and<br />

he cautions aga<strong>in</strong>st be<strong>in</strong>g “misled by <strong>the</strong> dramatic nature of our sources,” dur<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

high-tide of Christian violence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern empire which he estimates began <strong>in</strong> 386<br />

with <strong>the</strong> destruction of temples <strong>in</strong> Syria and ended <strong>in</strong> 392 with <strong>the</strong> destruction of <strong>the</strong><br />

Serapeum <strong>in</strong> Alexandria. 270 However, this law <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cident at<br />

Call<strong>in</strong>icum, five years previously, was not an isolated example of Christian militancy<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st synagogues; <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>in</strong> its brevity and <strong>in</strong> its apparently rout<strong>in</strong>e style, it gives <strong>the</strong><br />

impression of be<strong>in</strong>g quite <strong>the</strong> opposite of a source with a “dramatic nature.” It<br />

strongly suggests that such violence was nei<strong>the</strong>r uncommon nor isolated; an<br />

impression that is re<strong>in</strong>forced by <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> plural <strong>in</strong> this law. Theodosius' law<br />

shows that no allowance will now be made for such violence. It was issued three<br />

months after Addeus is known to have assumed his command, so this decided action<br />

by Theodosius' government to deal with such violence may be attributable to a<br />

personal desire by Addeus to curb such Christian militancy. 271<br />

CJ 1.9.7 of 30 December 393 was issued to Infantius, Count of <strong>the</strong> East; it is<br />

Theodosius' last law on <strong>the</strong> Jews. 272 It ordered that “none of <strong>the</strong> Jews” shall keep <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

“custom <strong>in</strong> marriage unions” nor should <strong>the</strong>y “contract nuptials accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir law,<br />

269 iudaeorum sectam nulla lege prohibitam satis constat. unde grav iter com m ov em ur <strong>in</strong>terdictos quibusdam<br />

locis eorum fuisse conv entus. sublim is igitur m agnitudo tua hac iussion e suscepta nim ietatem eorum , qui sub<br />

christianae religionis nom <strong>in</strong>e illicita quaeque praesum unt et destruere synagogas adque expoliare conantur,<br />

congrua sev eritate cohibebit<br />

270 Brown (1998) 646-647 quote at 647<br />

271 Addeus’ first known law is CTh. 1.5.10 of 12 June 393<br />

272 Honoré’s (1998) E11; Infantius PLRE 1.456<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!