31.12.2012 Views

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

Religious Intolerance in the Later Roman Empire - Bad request ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

clerics who had been banished by Constantius and not recalled by Julian, closed <strong>the</strong><br />

temples, and prevented blood sacrifice. 7 Sozomen records that he restored <strong>the</strong><br />

privileges previously due to <strong>the</strong> Church and clerics, but withdrawn by Julian; however<br />

this should be qualified with evidence from Theodoret who <strong>in</strong>dicates that Jovian only<br />

restored <strong>the</strong> grants of money to one third of <strong>the</strong> amount set by Constant<strong>in</strong>e. 8 Such<br />

steps are consistent with Ammianus’ verdict on Jovian that “he was an adherent of <strong>the</strong><br />

Christian faith and took some steps to exalt it.” Ammianus has no <strong>in</strong>dication that<br />

“some steps to exalt it” necessitated <strong>the</strong> denigration of o<strong>the</strong>r faiths. 9<br />

Sozomen also contends that Jovian believed that <strong>the</strong> impiety of Julian had<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present military disaster; as such Jovian wrote to all <strong>the</strong> governors<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y should allow <strong>the</strong> people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> churches and <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong><br />

emperor regarded Christianity as <strong>the</strong> only true faith. 10 Both historians relate <strong>the</strong> same<br />

story of Jovian’s <strong>in</strong>itial reluctance to take <strong>the</strong> throne because, as a Christian, he was<br />

unwill<strong>in</strong>g to rule over pagans. Both sources state that only when <strong>the</strong> soldiery<br />

pronounced <strong>the</strong>mselves to be Christians as well did Jovian agree to become emperor. 11<br />

Socrates complements this story with ano<strong>the</strong>r that Julian had ordered through an edict<br />

that officers on his staff should sacrifice; Jovian, along with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>ian and Valens, offered <strong>the</strong>ir resignations ra<strong>the</strong>r than sacrifice. 12 Although<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce Jovian did <strong>in</strong>deed serve under Julian <strong>the</strong> extent or seriousness of <strong>the</strong> late<br />

emperor’s demand may be questioned.<br />

Jovian may have allowed himself to be <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed towards Christianity, but it<br />

seems unlikely that he was by this stage such an ideologue that he would have gone so<br />

far as to confidently def<strong>in</strong>e himself as a Nicene Christian and <strong>the</strong>ir narratives of his<br />

6 Soc. 3.25<br />

7 Soc. 3.24<br />

8 Jones (1964) 89, 898-899, 1374n 66; Theod 1.11<br />

9 Amm. Marc. 25.10.15: Christianae legis itidem studious et n onnum quam honorificus.<br />

10 Soz. 6.3<br />

11 Soz. 6.3, Soc. 3.22<br />

12 Soc. 3.13 and 3.22<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!