You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a woman in the mid 1930s – she positioned a huge mirror with a rococo<br />
frame made of plaster over the fireplace. 45 Such strategies served to align<br />
those interiors much more closely with European developments and to<br />
radicalize the idea of the period room in the us.<br />
In spite of those striking innovations the tensions that had existed<br />
in the years before 1939 between architects and interior decorators over<br />
the right to design and control interior spaces in buildings, in both the<br />
private and the public spheres, reached a climax in the 1940s. <strong>The</strong> tension<br />
was caused by architects’ fears of becoming feminized and of being linked<br />
to trade rather than to a profession. <strong>The</strong>y sought universal solutions and<br />
dismissed the lady decorators as untrained and working through intuition<br />
alone. 46 By the mid-twentieth century the idea of facilitating selfexpression<br />
and of constructing feminine identity through the interior<br />
was well established, however. It placed the work of the lady decorators<br />
in direct opposition to the male architectural approach to the design of<br />
the interior. As a result, in the words of one writer, ‘by the 1940s [inter -<br />
ior] design was professionalized and colonized by architects and the<br />
emerging brand of industrial designer. A new model emerged which was<br />
opposed to . . . the feminized amateur practice which dominated interior<br />
decoration in the inter-war period.’ 47<br />
<strong>The</strong> abundance of mass-mediated, modern decorative interior<br />
styles available in the marketplace by the middle years of the twentieth<br />
century provided consumers, at most levels of society, with an opportunity<br />
to select from a range of modern identities and to follow de Wolfe’s<br />
1913 advice. Given that they were nearly all made up of mass-produced<br />
and mass-disseminated components, and reproduced in mass circulation<br />
magazines, the move from individual self-expression in the home to<br />
collective expression in leisure and other public sphere activities did not<br />
involve a huge transformation. Whether in the home or in public spaces,<br />
interiors were very likely to be have been influenced by the aspirational<br />
styles depicted in Hollywood films and in the pages of home-oriented<br />
magazines. Through the agency of the mass media, therefore, self expression<br />
was rapidly transformed into a more collective expression of the age,<br />
and what had once been private became overtly public.<br />
As the first section of this book has demonstrated, by engaging so<br />
profoundly with so many of modernity’s defining themes, bourgeois<br />
domesticity played a fundamental role in the formation of the modern<br />
interior, although it was visually transformed by the plethora of modern<br />
styles it embraced in the period between 1850 and 1939. It also infiltrated 109