You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 <strong>The</strong> Designed <strong>Interior</strong><br />
Whether a home is hand- or machine-built, it is no good unless it is<br />
properly designed.<br />
George Nelson and Henry Wright1 By 1945 all the components of the modern interior were in place. Its<br />
formation had been driven by the shifting identities of the inhabitants of<br />
the modern world and by the complex, and ever-changing, relationship<br />
between the private and the public spheres that inevitably accompanied<br />
that level of identity instability. While, on the one hand, the domestic<br />
model had broken through the physical boundaries of the ‘home’ to<br />
inhabit a wide variety of semi-public and public inside spaces, on the<br />
other, through the intervention of reforming architects and designers,<br />
aspects of the public sphere had also entered the private arena. As a result<br />
a stylistic spectrum of modern interiors, developed by architects, designers<br />
and decorators of all kinds, had emerged, communicating a wide<br />
range of cultural, psychological, social, economic and technical values.<br />
In the years between 1945 and the late 1960s the <strong>Modern</strong>ist interior<br />
reinvented itself yet again. It did so through the continuing movement of<br />
its visual, material and spatial languages between the spheres. Above all<br />
its defining characteristics – formed both within modern domestic spaces<br />
and in interior sites dedicated to modern public sphere activities – came<br />
closer together, both in the home and outside it. In essence a hybrid<br />
aesthetic, defined both psychologically and technically, and referred to<br />
in writings of the time as ‘humanised <strong>Modern</strong>ism’, emerged, first in the<br />
domestic context but almost immediately afterwards outside it as well. It<br />
was ‘engineered’ by a new generation of reforming architects and designers<br />
who extended the ambitions of the inter-war <strong>Modern</strong>ists, in particular<br />
their desire to create a Gesamtkunstwerk, to prioritize the role of the architect,<br />
to create overtly modern spaces that reflected their own era and to<br />
cross the private and the public divide. Although that new approach was<br />
driven by idealistic architects and designers working at the highest social<br />
and cultural levels, in that era of accelerated mass mediation it quickly 185