21.01.2013 Views

The Modern Interior

The Modern Interior

The Modern Interior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146<br />

that time, governed consumption decisions. In spite of that volte-face on<br />

the part of one of the most important pioneers of the rational household,<br />

by the 1920s its impact on the formulation of the modern interior was<br />

complete and for many years it remained, in aesthetic if not in ideological<br />

terms, one of its key characteristics. As we have seen it found its stylistic<br />

expression in the ‘machine aesthetic’. Indeed by the inter-war years the<br />

modern interior was defined by the modern-looking furniture items,<br />

furnishings and decor that appeared in it, made possible by new manufacturing<br />

techniques and the use of new materials – aluminium, plastics and<br />

bent plywood among them. In spite of the idealism of its protagonists –<br />

whether social reformers, feminists or <strong>Modern</strong>ist architects – such was the<br />

power of the marketplace and the dominance of the ‘irrational’ values<br />

linked to consumption that, by the 1930s, the modern interior had come<br />

to be recognized more by the visual language that represented it than by<br />

the efficiency of the work undertaken within it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> strong desire to embed the rationality underpinning the<br />

activities that went on in the production- and work-related interiors of<br />

the public sphere in the private dwelling represented a real commitment<br />

to its radical transformation. For women it had offered the possibility of<br />

their liberation from the drudgery and amateur status of the private<br />

sphere, while for the <strong>Modern</strong>ist architects and designers it provided a<br />

means of ridding the home of bourgeois domesticity (and thereby defeminizing<br />

it), of making it a healthy environment and of realigning it<br />

with the ‘masculine’ values of work and rationality. In Le Corbusier’s case<br />

it allowed him to bring the middle-class male camaraderie and companionship<br />

of the male club into the home. Ultimately, however, those diverse<br />

agendas were all overtaken by the logic – or rather the lack of logic – of<br />

the marketplace that transformed that set of abstract idealisms into yet<br />

another stylistic option available to consumers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!