You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
140<br />
fronts were a deep blue (although even this could be justified functionally<br />
as it was a colour which was believed to repel flies), and the employment<br />
of strikingly modern materials, linoleum, glass and metal among them.<br />
While they could also be justified functionally, they made a significant<br />
contribution, nonetheless, to the kitchen’s modern look. <strong>The</strong> impact of<br />
the Frankfurt kitchen, which quickly went into mass production, was<br />
enormous. It took the idea of rationality into the home on a significant<br />
scale and, through the control it gave to her, became a symbol of the professionalization<br />
of the housewife. At the same time it removed much<br />
drudgery from food preparation. <strong>The</strong> same principles were soon applied<br />
to the bathroom and to the laundry. <strong>The</strong> emphasis on the kitchen, however,<br />
had implications for the conceptualization of the modern house, or<br />
apartment, as a whole such that, in the words of Schütte-Lihotzky herself,<br />
‘the arrangement of the kitchen and its relationship to the other rooms<br />
in the dwelling must be considered first.’ 20 That seemingly simple statement<br />
had dramatic implications for the evolution of the modern domestic<br />
interior, suggesting, as it did, that houses should be designed from the<br />
inside out, rather than the reverse. That strategy was soon to become one<br />
of the lasting tenets and legacies of architectural <strong>Modern</strong>ism. While on<br />
the one hand it had the effect of minimizing the autonomy of the interior<br />
by merging it with the architectural shell, on the other, the idea of letting<br />
the plan determine the façade imbued the interior with a new level of<br />
importance. By giving the elements within the plan utilitarian definitions<br />
– the kitchen, the bathroom and the living space for example – they<br />
became driving forces behind architectural design as a whole. Indeed<br />
the interior became the pivot around which all architectural decisions<br />
were made.<br />
<strong>The</strong> idea of following the processes of efficient production led to<br />
a similar level of rationalization in the role of furniture in the ‘minimum<br />
dwelling’. Bruno Taut addressed the subject in his book Die Neue<br />
Wohnung (1924), in which he also made references to Christine Frederick,<br />
and Ernst May took the idea forward in the Frankfurt project. Indeed<br />
May saw a wholesale need to reform the house inside and out. ‘Because’,<br />
he wrote, ‘the outside world of today affects us in the most intense and<br />
disparate ways, our way of life is changing more rapidly than in previous<br />
times. It goes without saying that our surroundings will undergo corresponding<br />
changes. This leads us to layouts, spaces and buildings of which<br />
every part can be altered, which are flexible, and which can be combined<br />
in different fashions.’ 21