You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
206<br />
intrusion of the media into our private spaces has reached new and<br />
unprecedented levels.<br />
As we have seen, <strong>Modern</strong>ism’s legacy continues into the early<br />
twenty-first century. However, the power of commerce has stripped it of<br />
its ideological underpinnings and transformed it into just one more fashionable<br />
interior style. Unable to resist the pull of consumerism it has<br />
been transformed into the ‘minimal interior’, a result of the encounter of<br />
modern art with architecture and a marker of modern luxury connoting<br />
high levels of ‘cultural capital’ through what is absent rather than what<br />
is present. In contrast to the nineteenth-century home interior, which<br />
displayed its occupants’ social status through an accretion of objects,<br />
the minimal interior has declared itself an artwork and a sign of the<br />
enhanced social status that now flows from merging art with everyday<br />
life. <strong>The</strong> approach towards the modern interior which, in the hands of<br />
Gerrit Rietveld, Mies van der Rohe and other <strong>Modern</strong>ists focused on<br />
the immateriality of space and the idea of a new, anti-materialistic life -<br />
style had, by the late twentieth century, succumbed to the power of the<br />
marketplace and the imperatives of the fashion system. Another of<br />
<strong>Modern</strong>ism’s legacies – the adoption of the rational processes developed<br />
in the workplace into the home – is less stylistically determined. That<br />
approach is still visible today in women’s magazines and consumer advice<br />
publications. <strong>The</strong> author of an article published in Good Housekeeping<br />
magazine in January 2003, for instance, offered ‘50 expert ideas for organising<br />
your home’, which included the implementation of a clothes storage<br />
system involving ‘grouping tops and bottoms separately in co-ordinating<br />
colours’, ‘filing appliance instructions in document files’ and ‘allocating<br />
an area [of the house] for household administration’. 1 With the advent of<br />
the ‘home office’, Frederick’s 1913 dream has, on one level, finally became<br />
a reality.<br />
By far the strongest force to influence the development of the modern<br />
interior in recent years, however, has been its relationship with the<br />
mass media. In the 1940s in the us, and later elsewhere, television began<br />
to take on a parallel role to magazines in the home. As they had been in<br />
nineteenth-century theatre productions and inter-war films, interiors<br />
were presented to consumers through the medium of television in a variety<br />
of ways. <strong>The</strong>y were the subjects of advertisements, the backcloths for<br />
other products in advertisements, and the settings for dramas and comedies.<br />
This brought into play yet another version of the ‘interior within the<br />
interior’, this time one located, like Loos’s ‘theatre’, within the domestic