06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The demand for the L-Band GNSS frequencies will become increasingly widespread<br />

throughout Europe as the reliance on GNSS for airborne navigation increases. Issues<br />

surrounding the possible interference from ARNS (DMEs) in the 1164-1215MHz band<br />

must be resolved in the near future. This is due to problems at high altitudes (when<br />

several DME stations are visible to the antenna, the in-band signals increase), and this in<br />

spite of directional antenna. Although the ITU has addressed the issue, there is an ongoing<br />

discussion on the extent of the problem (the conclusion of which will be important,<br />

as the introduction of the L5 band at 1176.45 MHz +/-12 MHz for GPS and the E5 band at<br />

1188-1208MHz for Galileo will have an impact). WRC-03 established Resolutions 609 &<br />

610 (WRC-03) and Recommendation 608 (WRC-03). Further solutions may include the<br />

reallocation of the DMEs, or by the further limiting of the power flux density of either<br />

system.<br />

• From the perspective of the 1215-1300 MHz band, the situation is complicated.<br />

The rights of existing ARNS (in the form of primary radars) are defended by<br />

several parties. Whether this is valid, and if so how to protect ARNS, has<br />

remained a matter for debate for 3-4 years.<br />

Although limits have been successfully imposed in the lower L-band to protect DME, the<br />

technology issues are different here – the military currently uses the GPS allocation inband<br />

(GPS L2) for precise positioning services and it strongly defends the right to<br />

maximum signal strength. As Galileo is introduced, a new band (E6) will be used; this falls<br />

in the middle of the UK’s primary radar frequency pattern. Evidently, if E6 becomes a<br />

prime civil signal carrier frequency, the effects on ARNS will become more prevalent than<br />

is currently the case. The UK, through CAA, MoD and <strong>Ofcom</strong>, is currently looking at this<br />

issue. ICAO is also preparing studies to resolve the debate. WRC-03 modified Radio<br />

Regulation footnotes 5.329, 5.331 and established Resolutions 608 and 610 (WRC-03) in<br />

relation to the use of the band 1215 – 1300 MHz.<br />

The 1559-1626.5MHz allocations are strongly defended by the relevant aviation bodies<br />

(e.g. ICAO); although 72 countries (Europe/Middle East) have established fixed services<br />

allocated to this band (Footnotes 5.362B and 5.362C), the ITU agreed at WRC2000 that<br />

the usability of GNSS was constrained by these fixed services, and as such, the<br />

allocation should be ceased as soon as practicable. As a result, in many countries these<br />

fixed services remain a primary allocation until 2005, and then become a secondary (noninterfering)<br />

service until 2015, when they shall cease. Note that the UK is not included in<br />

this footnote (i.e. no fixed services in this band) but neighbouring countries (i.e. France)<br />

are.<br />

From the Earth-space perspective, the allocation of 1300-1350 MHz to Galileo ground<br />

stations is subject to studies in geographical separation criteria between the ground<br />

stations and radio-navigation aids (primary radars) (WRC2000 – Resolution 607).<br />

From the socio-economic point of view, there have been major investments in Galileo<br />

(and EGNOS) by European organisations, agencies and companies – in order to justify<br />

this, they will want to see solid returns. Political pressure is likely to be brought to ensure<br />

that GNSS sees increasing demand.<br />

Page 105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!