FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The demand for the L-Band GNSS frequencies will become increasingly widespread<br />
throughout Europe as the reliance on GNSS for airborne navigation increases. Issues<br />
surrounding the possible interference from ARNS (DMEs) in the 1164-1215MHz band<br />
must be resolved in the near future. This is due to problems at high altitudes (when<br />
several DME stations are visible to the antenna, the in-band signals increase), and this in<br />
spite of directional antenna. Although the ITU has addressed the issue, there is an ongoing<br />
discussion on the extent of the problem (the conclusion of which will be important,<br />
as the introduction of the L5 band at 1176.45 MHz +/-12 MHz for GPS and the E5 band at<br />
1188-1208MHz for Galileo will have an impact). WRC-03 established Resolutions 609 &<br />
610 (WRC-03) and Recommendation 608 (WRC-03). Further solutions may include the<br />
reallocation of the DMEs, or by the further limiting of the power flux density of either<br />
system.<br />
• From the perspective of the 1215-1300 MHz band, the situation is complicated.<br />
The rights of existing ARNS (in the form of primary radars) are defended by<br />
several parties. Whether this is valid, and if so how to protect ARNS, has<br />
remained a matter for debate for 3-4 years.<br />
Although limits have been successfully imposed in the lower L-band to protect DME, the<br />
technology issues are different here – the military currently uses the GPS allocation inband<br />
(GPS L2) for precise positioning services and it strongly defends the right to<br />
maximum signal strength. As Galileo is introduced, a new band (E6) will be used; this falls<br />
in the middle of the UK’s primary radar frequency pattern. Evidently, if E6 becomes a<br />
prime civil signal carrier frequency, the effects on ARNS will become more prevalent than<br />
is currently the case. The UK, through CAA, MoD and <strong>Ofcom</strong>, is currently looking at this<br />
issue. ICAO is also preparing studies to resolve the debate. WRC-03 modified Radio<br />
Regulation footnotes 5.329, 5.331 and established Resolutions 608 and 610 (WRC-03) in<br />
relation to the use of the band 1215 – 1300 MHz.<br />
The 1559-1626.5MHz allocations are strongly defended by the relevant aviation bodies<br />
(e.g. ICAO); although 72 countries (Europe/Middle East) have established fixed services<br />
allocated to this band (Footnotes 5.362B and 5.362C), the ITU agreed at WRC2000 that<br />
the usability of GNSS was constrained by these fixed services, and as such, the<br />
allocation should be ceased as soon as practicable. As a result, in many countries these<br />
fixed services remain a primary allocation until 2005, and then become a secondary (noninterfering)<br />
service until 2015, when they shall cease. Note that the UK is not included in<br />
this footnote (i.e. no fixed services in this band) but neighbouring countries (i.e. France)<br />
are.<br />
From the Earth-space perspective, the allocation of 1300-1350 MHz to Galileo ground<br />
stations is subject to studies in geographical separation criteria between the ground<br />
stations and radio-navigation aids (primary radars) (WRC2000 – Resolution 607).<br />
From the socio-economic point of view, there have been major investments in Galileo<br />
(and EGNOS) by European organisations, agencies and companies – in order to justify<br />
this, they will want to see solid returns. Political pressure is likely to be brought to ensure<br />
that GNSS sees increasing demand.<br />
Page 105