06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4.7.7 L-Band DME<br />

Internationally, the implementation of UAT (Universal Access Transceiver) for ADS-B will<br />

impact upon a narrow range of frequencies in-band (thought to be around 966MHz or<br />

978MHz). Initially, this will affect the USA, but the requirement for global harmonisation<br />

may see this frequency allocated in Europe in the medium term.<br />

The MoD uses some of the spectrum for aeronautical communications, following<br />

agreements with DAP (for non-interference with the primary use of ARNS).<br />

3.4.7.8 L-Band GNSS<br />

The introduction and proliferation of Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) solutions has caused<br />

concern amongst the aviation fraternity, in part because UWB has been unregulated in<br />

the past. UWB is a low-power, high bandwidth communications method, with bandwidths<br />

spread over more than 1.5MHz.<br />

The effects of UWB can be negated by technical solutions – examples include frequency<br />

hopping or pulsing, thus avoiding the RNSS and ARNS allocated frequencies. However,<br />

problems still exist with the aggregate effect that thousands of mobile wireless unlicensed<br />

UWB devices might have on the overall noise floor. The USA has detected the problem<br />

(as described in a recent IATA paper), and points out that spectrum protection is not<br />

conducted by the airlines, but by government or international bodies. UWB spectrum is<br />

part of private spectrum that is overseen in the US by the Federal Communications<br />

Commission, which has a remit of allowing maximum access for the most users. As such,<br />

UWB is currently being promulgated through safety-of-life service frequency allocations<br />

(in particular, from 1559 to 1626.5MHz).<br />

3.4.8 Replacement Technologies (radio, other or none)<br />

3.4.8.1 Loran-C<br />

As the planned EGNOS technology comes on-line, there will be strong pressure for users<br />

to move to the new augmentation system (in time for the introduction of Galileo, Europe’s<br />

GNSS) – particularly if the safety case for EGNOS proves favourable for safety critical<br />

applications.<br />

3.4.8.2 NDB<br />

GNSS is likely to replace the requirement for NDBs, particularly as Galileo comes on-line<br />

circa 2008.<br />

The take-up of GNSS amongst GA users depends primarily on the availability of low-cost<br />

solutions.<br />

3.4.8.3 Marker Beacons<br />

Marker beacons are being replaced by DME systems (co-located with the ILS).<br />

3.4.8.4 ILS<br />

ILS may be replaced by MLS (Microwave Landing System), where the commercial and<br />

safety aspects are beneficial. MLS allows for greater accuracy, and negates the multipath<br />

effects experienced by ILS (off buildings, aircraft etc).<br />

In time, GNSS Landing Systems (GLS) may become standard – at present, they are able<br />

to support Category I approaches (work is on-going for Cat II and III).<br />

There is pressure on the glideslope allocation from other aeronautical mobile services.<br />

Page 110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!