06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Coverage of an area by NVIS techniques, which is normally in the skip zone i.e.<br />

that area which is normally too far away to receive ground-wave signals, but not<br />

yet far enough away to receive sky-waves reflected from the ionosphere.<br />

• NVIS requires no infrastructure such as repeaters or satellites. Two stations<br />

employing NVIS techniques can establish reliable communications without the<br />

support of any third party.<br />

• Signals propagated via the NVIS mode are relatively free from fading.<br />

• Antennas optimised for NVIS can usually be erected near to the ground. Simple<br />

dipoles work very well.<br />

• The path to and from the ionosphere is short and direct, resulting in lower path<br />

losses due to factors such as absorption by the D layer.<br />

• NVIS techniques can dramatically reduce noise and interference, resulting in an<br />

improved signal/noise ratio.<br />

• With its improved signal/noise ratio and low path loss, NVIS works well with low<br />

power thus facilitating spectrum sharing.<br />

The disadvantages of NVIS operation include:<br />

• Due to differences between daytime and night-time propagation, a minimum of<br />

two different frequencies must be used to ensure semi-reliable around-the-clock<br />

communications.<br />

• A need for antennas producing a high angle of radiation, the simplest of which<br />

would be a horizontal or semi horizontal dipole, not a convenient antenna for<br />

smaller vehicles or vessels.<br />

The selection of an optimum frequency for NVIS operation depends upon many variables.<br />

Among these are time of day, time of year, solar activity, type of antenna used,<br />

atmospheric noise, and atmospheric absorption.<br />

NVIS could provide for the shared use of the maritime mobile bands included in<br />

Appendices 17 and 25 of the ITU Radio Regulations for localised fixed and land mobile<br />

service operations. It could also be used for broadcasting and other point to point and<br />

point to multipoint radiocommunication services. Maritime HF communications are<br />

unlikely to be used at ranges less than 300 km because the MF maritime bands will offer<br />

a more reliable service. Ship stations receiving from a coast station located within the<br />

same general area as NVIS communication links being operated on land will therefore be<br />

beyond the range of those NVIS links. A possibility remains that ship stations operating<br />

close to the shore using long distance HF communications to contact a shore station in<br />

their own country may be affected; however, ships should normally operate to the nearest<br />

coast station for the purpose of public correspondence. Likewise, there is also a potential<br />

interference problem if the coast station receiving transmissions from a ship, lies within<br />

range of NVIS fixed/mobile operations. The possibility of shared use of some HF<br />

frequency bands between localised services using NVIS techniques and medium/long<br />

range services using low angle launch antennas and oblique angle reflection from the<br />

ionosphere would therefore appear to be feasible.<br />

6.6 MF - Communications<br />

6.6.1 Frequency Allocations (international, Region 1)<br />

The following bands are available for MF communications in ITU Region 1 and the EMA:<br />

Page 210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!