06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIN Yes Yes No<br />

S Yes No No<br />

UK No 36 No Yes (auction or<br />

administrative<br />

pricing )<br />

Table 7-5 – General situation concerning the application of fees and charges in EU Member<br />

States<br />

Note that all Member States apply administrative fees of some description, in some cases<br />

for spectrum licences and in some cases for network / service licences. The latter only<br />

apply to public telecommunications networks.<br />

In those countries that do not apply administrative fees for spectrum licensing, relevant<br />

costs are recovered either by means of cost-based spectrum fees or are recovered from<br />

the proceeds of administrative pricing or auctions. For cost-based spectrum fees, all the<br />

NRA’s relevant costs are recovered from all the licensees, but the amount recovered from<br />

individual licensees is a function of the amount and type of spectrum resource that is<br />

licensed.<br />

7.2.7 Purpose of Administrative Fees and Spectrum Charges<br />

There are two principal reasons why it is necessary to levy fees and charges for<br />

radiocommunications services. Firstly, administrative fees are required to cover the costs<br />

associated with issuing licences, monitoring market behaviour and enforcing licence<br />

conditions.<br />

Secondly, spectrum charges should reflect the need to provide an incentive for those using<br />

spectrum to do so in the most efficient manner and to ensure optimum use of scarce<br />

spectrum resources. Charges may also be applied to encourage users who have a viable<br />

alternative (e.g. the use of fibre optic cable instead of fixed radio links) to vacate spectrum,<br />

making way for new market entrants or new service offerings which value spectrum more,<br />

thus optimising the economic benefits of the use of the spectrum. In a competitive bidding<br />

scenario, spectrum charges can also provide an objective and transparent means of<br />

awarding licences where the number is limited due to the scarcity of spectrum.<br />

The radio spectrum is a finite resource, representing a relatively small amount of the<br />

broader electromagnetic spectrum that includes infra-red and optical frequencies with<br />

many orders of magnitude more bandwidth. The value of spectrum over other electronic<br />

communication media is not so much its capacity for information transmission, but its<br />

ability to convey such information to remote users under a wide variety of scenarios,<br />

including a full mobile capability. This value is particularly apparent in mobile and<br />

broadcast applications, where radio spectrum provides the only means for wide area<br />

wireless delivery of services over non-line of sight paths.<br />

The attractiveness of certain parts of the spectrum is further enhanced by the physical<br />

properties of the spectrum (notably the available bandwidth, geographic range and re-use<br />

capability) and the service to which the spectrum has been allocated by the ITU and<br />

regional bodies such as the CEPT. In practice, terrestrial broadcasting and wide area<br />

mobile communications are constrained to frequencies below 3 GHz (to provide wide area<br />

non-line of sight coverage), whereas line of sight applications such as terrestrial fixed links<br />

36 [In the UK cost based administrative fees apply for aeronautical and maritime services.<br />

Spectrum charges or administrative pricing have not so far been implemented for<br />

aeronautical and maritime services.]<br />

Page 263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!