06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.3.8 Possible Overall Spectrum Efficiency Improvements<br />

As with many of the ship-borne devices employed to assist visibility of objects, it is<br />

changes in the specification of the interrogating radar that would bring about the greatest<br />

potential efficiency gains, and not the transponders such as RTEs.<br />

4.4 Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

Though opportunities improving the spectral efficiency of the radar and associated<br />

technologies used for maritime radiodetermination are limited, there are potential<br />

modifications to spectrum use which could make overall more efficient use of spectrum.<br />

Recommendation 4.1: The 5 GHz band is little used by (commercial) maritime radar in<br />

and around the UK. It is already shared with PMSE and HiperLAN. Further sharing of this<br />

spectrum with other, suitably compatible services should be investigated.<br />

The fact that the existing 5 GHz maritime radar band is already successfully shared with<br />

other compatible services implies that further sharing opportunities may exist.<br />

Socio-Economic Issues<br />

It is our understanding that few, if any, UK vessels are fitted with 5 GHz radar equipment.<br />

Thus, the impact to the UK shipping community of the removal of (all or part of) this band<br />

or increased sharing would be minimal both in terms of cost to the industry and in terms<br />

of operational impact. However, there may still be occasions when non-UK registered<br />

vessels which do use 5 GHz radars enter UK waters. This would have 2 potentially large<br />

impacts:<br />

UK services using the 5 GHz band may be impacted by the transmissions from the<br />

radars. This is most likely to occur in coastal areas and the impact would depend, to a<br />

large extent, on the technology chosen to operate in the band. For example, the existing<br />

HiperLAN specifications take specific account of the presence of radars. Similar sharing<br />

criteria 18 may need to be considered if the band is to be used for permanent (e.g.<br />

operating 24 hours x 7 days) services.<br />

The radars on the affected vessels will suffer interference. Unless the vessels are fitted<br />

with ONLY a 5 GHz radar, which is unlikely if they are covered by GMDSS rules, as at<br />

least one on-board radar must be in the 9 GHz band, and then interference to the radar<br />

would not cause an operational problem. The situation is further improved by the fact that<br />

the interference would occur when the radar was sweeping across the UK landmass, and<br />

not whilst out to sea. Of course, this would hamper detection of other vessels between the<br />

vessel and the coast but as the 9 GHz radars would continue to function, the overall loss<br />

of visibility would be minimal.<br />

Regulatory Impact<br />

Increased sharing of the 5 GHz band with other services would not require a change to<br />

any standard or specification relating to maritime radar equipment, as no change to the<br />

radars themselves would be required.<br />

The next step would be for <strong>Ofcom</strong> to determine appropriate sharing criteria for the band.<br />

Such a determination will involve consideration of the role of the other services already<br />

sharing the band and may show that further sharing is not practical. If such an<br />

investigation did, however, prove the possibility of additional sharing, <strong>Ofcom</strong> may also<br />

wish to consider giving notice that it intends to open the band for further sharing in order<br />

18 Such as the use of Reed-Solomon or BCH codes<br />

Page 139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!