06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecommended for future good management of spectral efficiency. These performance<br />

improvements are unlikely to lead to any change in band allocation requirements in the<br />

short term although it can be expected that they will contain the future growth of civil radar<br />

system requirements within these bands.<br />

3.2.8.5 X Band and Ku Band Civil ATC Radars<br />

X band contains a mix of short range approach radars and surface movement radars. Ku<br />

band contains three surface movement radars (Heathrow, Edinburgh and Stansted<br />

Airports). The use of X band short range approach radars is likely to remain static for the<br />

foreseeable future. The use of surface movement radars is likely to increase as a result of<br />

increased traffic and security requirements. Given the short range requirements for<br />

surface movement radar and the downward looking nature of the antenna, the question<br />

arises as to whether two bands are necessary for this application. X band offers superior<br />

weather performance although a larger antenna is required to maintain beam shape<br />

requirements. The possibility of moving surface movement radars currently located in Ku<br />

band to X band should therefore be considered.<br />

3.2.9 Socio Economic Issues<br />

This section first considers general socio-economic issues associated with primary radar<br />

systems and then examines the cost and implementation issues associated with the<br />

potential spectrum management improvement initiatives outlined in the report. Any costs<br />

given can only be considered illustrative at this stage.<br />

3.2.9.1 Spectrum Management<br />

The UK CAA deploys a high level of expertise to manage aeronautical spectrum in coordination<br />

with the MoD. Coupled with close co-operation with <strong>Ofcom</strong>, this arrangement<br />

provides the appropriate level of expertise needed to achieve spectrum management<br />

objectives. Approaches to band sharing are discussed separately.<br />

3.2.9.2 Public Perception<br />

Primary radar is seen by aviation professionals and public alike as an essential safety of<br />

life technology. It is assumed that aircraft are under permanent surveillance by one<br />

system or another. The possibility that performance might suffer as a result of<br />

interference from a third party would probably be considered unacceptable.<br />

3.2.9.3 Equipment Costs<br />

The cost of providing aeronautical surveillance radar services is very high due to the high<br />

performance and integrity requirements. Also they are generally produced in low volume<br />

which results in substantial development cost overheads.<br />

Approximate project costs for a dual channel L band radar system are in the range £5m to<br />

£10m. Approximate costs of SSR equipment is in the range £2m to £4m. Building and<br />

services costs are very variable depending on location and access road requirements but<br />

are likely to exceed £4m. An S band Primary Radar is likely to cost around £3m<br />

including buildings. These high costs result in long life expectancy for the equipment<br />

which, in turn, reduces the rate of the modernisation of the technology. Replacement<br />

costs assume that the new equipment can be installed in parallel with existing equipment<br />

thereby avoiding service outages and related costs. These costs also make allowance for<br />

installation and formal acceptance procedures.<br />

It will be appreciated that air traffic service providers would be reluctant to spend these<br />

sums of money if cheaper alternative technologies were readily available. This is<br />

Page 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!