06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It should be noted that a number of the specific recommendations have already been<br />

implemented or planned by service providers. In particular, the use of solid state systems<br />

with pulse compression is becoming more widely adopted.<br />

3.2.10.1 Specific Measures to Release Spectrum<br />

Recommendation 3.1: <strong>Ofcom</strong> in association with the CAA may wish to consider whether<br />

it is feasible to replace the UHF Primary radars in Channel 36 in favour of S band or L<br />

band equipment. It is necessary to review the review the operational requirement for<br />

these systems and the appropriate timescale for replacement with the relevant operating<br />

authorities. It could be implemented as part of the normal equipment replacement cycle.<br />

Recommendation 3.2: The possibility of moving surface movement radars currently in<br />

Ku Band to X band should be considered thereby releasing Ku band for other<br />

applications. The cost of this is estimated at around £9m (project costs). The amount of<br />

spectrum released needs to be confirmed with the MoD. It could be implemented as part<br />

of the normal equipment replacement cycle.<br />

Recommendation 3.3: In the longer term, alternative systems with the potential to<br />

release spectrum should be further evaluated and developed.<br />

3.2.10.2 General Improvements to the Spectral Characteristics of Primary<br />

Radar<br />

Recommendation 3.4: A long term policy to replace magnetron transmitters should be<br />

adopted. Such improvements could be instigated by CAA and <strong>Ofcom</strong> under the terms of<br />

the licensing agreement. The cost of replacing magnetron systems is estimated at £66m<br />

(S band and X band approach radars) and could be implemented under the normal<br />

replacement cycle. Increases in spectral efficiency are likely to be offset by increasing<br />

demand for radar services.<br />

Recommendation 3.5: In the short term, consideration should be given to equipping<br />

magnetron transmitters with low pass filters to meet the current emission mask. This<br />

approach may be necessary where the systems concerned have a long life expectancy.<br />

Costs are in the range £20k to £100k per installation.<br />

Recommendation 3.6: The current unwanted emission mask should be adopted as the<br />

medium term goal for primary radar systems.<br />

Recommendation 3.7: Pulse compression should be the technology of choice for future<br />

primary radar systems for both operational requirement and spectrum reasons.<br />

Recommendation 3.8: Solid state transmitters should be adopted for future systems<br />

given the ability to control pulse rise and fall times to minimise the out of band emissions<br />

and the single channel fail soft capability to minimise frequency requirements. This<br />

approach is also preferred for operational requirement reasons.<br />

3.2.10.3 Band Sharing<br />

Recommendation 3.9: More visibility of spectrum used by the military in the L and S<br />

bands may assist the delivery of improved spectrum efficiency. <strong>Ofcom</strong> should consider an<br />

initiative in this area.<br />

Recommendation 3.10: The overriding recommendation in the area of band sharing is<br />

for the development of a methodology which can assess the feasibility of band sharing.<br />

This would lead to a more strategic approach to the identification of band sharing<br />

opportunities. These developments should be carried out by a group representing all<br />

interested parties.<br />

Page 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!