06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

management and planning. They also support <strong>Ofcom</strong> in terms of aeronautical<br />

requirements through bodies such as the ITU, ICAO and CEPT.<br />

The study excluded consideration of the military frequency requirements which may have<br />

significant impact on the primary radar utilisation status, notably in the L and S bands.<br />

The feasibility of increased standardisation of primary radar characteristics should be<br />

considered as a means for improving spectral efficiency and increased compatibility with<br />

potential band sharing services. This could be carried out by industry bodies such as<br />

EUROCAE for technical standards or by EUROCONTROL for operational standards. The<br />

UK CAA may also be willing to consider the incorporation of more detailed spectrum<br />

requirements in their documents such as CAP 670.<br />

Generally the detailed technical standardisation of primary radar is not highly developed.<br />

The self to self link nature of the system discourages technical standards which are<br />

difficult to apply. The consensus on detailed operational requirements for primary radar<br />

was outlined in section 3.2.3.<br />

3.2.5 Possible Improvements to Existing Technology<br />

3.2.5.1 Introduction<br />

Section 3.2.2 above (Primary Radar Technology) summarises the basic primary radar<br />

technology including some of the newer developments.<br />

This section is aimed at summarising the main techniques available to improve the<br />

spectrum utilisation of the current technology. The techniques described are essentially<br />

those that are considered proven for aeronautical safety of life applications.<br />

Primary radar transmits and receives its own signals. This has led to a situation where<br />

radar engineers have been able to design systems to meet specific operational<br />

requirements generally without regard to standards which are essential in a co-operative<br />

system such as Secondary Surveillance Radar.<br />

The consequences are that the characteristics of system vary widely and that each<br />

system must be considered on a case by case basis. Recommendations for<br />

improvements can only be guidelines as they may or may not apply to the specific<br />

systems concerned.<br />

Retrospective modifications to existing systems are generally very difficult to apply. This<br />

is because a radar system is usually a matched system where each component is<br />

optimised to meet the overall system performance objectives. An apparently small change<br />

in operating parameters often results in changes to other parts of the system and can be<br />

uneconomic. Improvements aimed at spectrum efficiency are generally more feasible for<br />

new systems provided the features are considered at the design stage. The life<br />

expectancy of primary radar systems is usually of the order of 15 to 20 years and this<br />

may govern the timescales for the introduction of more spectrally efficient systems.<br />

3.2.5.2 Efficient use of the radio spectrum by radar stations – Rec. ITU-R<br />

M.1372-1<br />

This Recommendation is a potential baseline for the consideration of spectral efficiency<br />

improvements. In summary, it addresses the questions of antenna performance (including<br />

3D systems), the use of advanced Doppler signal processing, integrators and constant<br />

false alarm detectors. The recommendation serves to illustrate the wide range of<br />

potential differences between radar systems with regard to spectral efficiency and<br />

suitability for band sharing. Most of the techniques are covered in the following sections.<br />

Page 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!