FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
operational requirement. However, the narrower the beam the larger the sidelobe levels<br />
become. Sidelobes constitute unnecessary illumination and need to be minimised for<br />
radar performance reasons. Strong targets (=large aircraft) will be seen by the main beam<br />
as well as the sidelobes resulting in multiple detections of the same aircraft at different<br />
azimuths (if we are considering the azimuth sidelobes). Therefore, in terms of antenna<br />
design, the radar performance objectives coincide with the requirements of optimum<br />
spectrum utilisation. Modern primary radar antenna designs utilising either conventional<br />
antenna designs or phased arrays represent the state of the art in terms of two<br />
dimensional radar systems.<br />
Three dimensional radar systems using phased arrays, which have electronic beam<br />
steering under computer control in three dimensions, offer the possibility of confining the<br />
illumination to the specific areas occupied by the target (noting that a sweep of the full<br />
coverage volume is required to initially acquire targets). Such systems are technically but<br />
not operationally proven and would be very costly to implement across the radar<br />
infrastructure. In view of the benefits to radar performance and the spatial aspects of<br />
spectrum efficiency, the application of 3D (phased array) systems to ATC surveillance<br />
radar should be considered as a research topic.<br />
3.2.5.13 Filters and Bandwidth Requirements<br />
The subject of bandwidth requirements and filters is complex. The bandwidth of every<br />
radar is different depending on pulse width, pulse rise-time, pulse compression frequency<br />
deviation, type of output device, frequency diversity, multi-pulse working etc. Therefore,<br />
the bandwidth of every type of radar must be calculated individually for each of the 3dB<br />
bandwidth, the necessary bandwidth (-20dB) and the out of band limits (-40dB).<br />
In general the introduction of filters at any point in the transmit/receive chain with band<br />
pass characteristics less than the spectrum of the transmitted waveform introduces<br />
distortion to the pulses. This distortion can take the form of time sidelobes, which are<br />
additional pulses either side of the desired pulse. These time sidelobes can cause false<br />
alarms because they have similar characteristics to the basic pulse.<br />
Time sidelobes can be introduced by the filter required by pulse compression (see Figure<br />
3-2) or by filters which are designed to minimise the transmitted spectrum.<br />
Filters which minimise the transmitted spectrum are designed to reduce out of band and<br />
spurious transmissions. Such filters can be useful in reducing the OoB and spurious<br />
emissions of magnetron systems. Typically, a low pass filter could be used at the 40 dB<br />
bandwidth to provide compliance with the 20dB/decade roll off characteristic defined in<br />
Figure 3-3. Application of filters around the necessary bandwidth (20dB) is likely to result<br />
in the introduction of time sidelobes. In general, a band pass filter can be applied based<br />
on the 40dB bandwidth of the pulse without serious pulse distortion, time sidelobes or<br />
impact on radar range performance to meet the unwanted emission mask.<br />
3.2.5.14 Statistical Analysis<br />
The use of statistical techniques in relation to the evaluation of band sharing opportunities<br />
has been considered by ITU Radiocommunication Study Group document 8B/28-E –<br />
“Use of Statistical and Operational Aspects in the Radar’s Protection Criteria”<br />
This document outlines the use of a particular statistical approach to determine what<br />
constitutes an unacceptable degradation of the operational performance of a radar<br />
system in the presence of short term interference. The paper first makes some illustrative<br />
assumptions about the processing techniques included in the whole radar chain including<br />
the controller’s radar processing and display system. It then considers the effect of<br />
permanent interference on the probability of detection. This model is then extended to<br />
consider the effect of sporadic interference. The conclusion is that under the assumed<br />
Page 50