06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The feasibility of utilising alternative communications for small commercial vessels has<br />

been addressed in previous sections in order to ascertain a possible value for MF<br />

maritime spectrum. It is at this point that it is pertinent to refer to the Government's<br />

response to the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs (ETRA) Committee's report<br />

'The Future of the UK Shipping Industry'. The Government has stated that action is now<br />

needed in order to reverse the decline in the UK shipping industry, and welcomed the<br />

Committee's general support of the Government's shipping policy paper, 'British Shipping:<br />

Charting a new course', which was designed to initiate the required action. The policy<br />

paper outlined the Government's strategy for securing the future of the UK shipping<br />

industry in the form of 33 action points designed to develop the UK's maritime skills,<br />

secure British seafaring employment, enhance the UK's attractiveness to shipping<br />

enterprises, and gain safety and environmental benefits. The ETRA recommended that<br />

urgent action should be taken both to increase the number of vessels on the UK register,<br />

and to increase the number of British seafarers. The Government agreed responding that<br />

two of the central aims of the Government's shipping policy were to encourage UK ship<br />

registration and to promote the employment and training of British seafarers. The<br />

Government's shipping policy paper sets out a number of actions designed to develop a<br />

shipping environment in which UK shipping companies would be encouraged to develop<br />

their shipping operations and register their vessels in the UK, and to develop the UK's<br />

maritime skills base by employing and training increasing numbers of British seafarers.<br />

Any policy developed for AIP which is based on the cost of alternative technology, which<br />

is significantly higher than the costs of the currently utilised technology may have an<br />

adverse impact on the registration plans of ship and fleet owners. This may particularly<br />

apply to the fishing fleet which as a consequence of declining fish stocks and necessary<br />

preservation measures has suffered badly in recent years.<br />

In many cases at MF and at HF and VHF the alternative communications mechanism for<br />

voice telephony is always commercial satellite providers with attendant equipment, space<br />

segment and registration costs. Fishing fleets rely heavily on MF inter-ship voice<br />

communications especially when out of VHF range of the coast and other fleet members.<br />

Distress and safety requirements might be handled more effectively using cost effective<br />

commercial data communications based on adaptive HF technology if the IMO approve<br />

such systems for participation in the GMDSS. However there would also be a need to<br />

update equipment and pay for the use of the service.<br />

Digital MF systems could be introduced on a national and non-interference basis without<br />

jeopardising the interoperability with ships from foreign countries. Introduction of new<br />

technology would in the long run require worldwide harmonisation in the ITU which is a<br />

cumbersome and time-consuming process with very long lead-times for the transition to<br />

new technologies. Developing countries are normally reluctant to changes due to the cost<br />

implications. On a national basis, new technologies could be introduced on a trial basis,<br />

but as has been pointed out before, there does not seem to be an incentive for the United<br />

Kingdom to embark on such an initiative.<br />

Another difficulty is that coast station equipment is only required in very small quantities<br />

with the consequence that economies of scale cannot be achieved, irrespective of<br />

whether conventional or more advanced technology, that better meets the needs of the<br />

user, is employed.<br />

It would therefore seem opportune for the United Kingdom to seek an in-depth European<br />

review of LF, MF and probably HF spectrum as well with a view to ascertaining European<br />

current and future requirements and to make the necessary recommendations and plans<br />

for the future. This could be achieved through a proposal for an additional phase of the<br />

Detailed Spectrum Investigation (DSI) process which has been a feature of European<br />

spectrum management since 1991. With a European approach, economies of scale can<br />

be achieved for regional solutions to regional requirements. Spectrum plans for the<br />

introduction of new technologies can also take account of the needs of existing services<br />

Page 216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!