06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An illustrative calculation of the costs associated with converting to 8.33 kHz has been<br />

provided in a recent study for <strong>Ofcom</strong> 25 . This is a good general illustration but a number of<br />

comments can be made:<br />

• An upgrade cost of £845 per aircraft is quoted. It is very doubtful that the change<br />

could be made by an upgrade of current radios (as is assumed in the recent<br />

study for <strong>Ofcom</strong>) – rather, the existing radio would have to be disposed of and<br />

replaced with a new radio. In order to introduce 8.33 kHz, all aircraft operating in<br />

a particular region must be equipped. However, the refresh time for radios in GA<br />

is likely to be even slower than AT class. A GA pilot will not change a radio<br />

unless absolutely necessary and possibly not within the lifetime of the aircraft (15<br />

years at least). Hence, 8.33 kHz could only be introduced at low altitude if there<br />

is requirement to change radios and possibly additional funding to make this<br />

possible. Hence, the illustrative calculation should include the full price of the<br />

8.33 kHz radio (£3,225) and not the marginal difference between a 25 kHz and<br />

8.33 kHz radio (i.e. we rely on wholescale change of the fleet rather than a drip<br />

feed via new aircraft).<br />

• The quoted value of £75,000 for upgrade of a ground station is accepted<br />

assuming it was sourced from NATS. However, the distinction between 8.33 kHz<br />

and 25 kHz equipage is not understood. A particular new ground radio would<br />

support both channel arrangements. Hence, in the illustration, all ground stations<br />

would have to be converted.<br />

• NATS will also incur additional costs to convert its voice network to handle 8.33<br />

kHz. The costs are estimated at £10M although this figure has not been<br />

validated.<br />

• An estimated cost of £20,000 for each non-ATC station upgrade is felt to be a<br />

reasonable estimate given the non-safety critical nature of the services<br />

(equivalent to the cost of a TETRA PAMR transceiver).<br />

• The report quotes 6,200 aircraft as requiring upgrade. Fleet data for the UK<br />

indicates that this may be higher (up to 8000) although in the table below 6,200<br />

has been used.<br />

A revised table (5-14) of marginal cost following the same method with revised input costs<br />

is therefore:<br />

Cost element Cost<br />

ATC station upgrade + Network conversion £45.25m<br />

Non-ATC station upgrade £28.32m<br />

Aircraft station upgrade £20.0m<br />

Total cost £93.57m<br />

Annualised total £9.99m<br />

Cost per MHz £1.05m<br />

Cost per 25 kHz £26,200<br />

Table 5- 14 Marginal Cost for conversion to 8.33 kHz<br />

25 “An economic study to review spectrum pricing”, INDEPEN, Aegis systems and<br />

Warwick Business School, February 2004.<br />

Page 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!