06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Co-ordination of PRF (pulse repetition frequency) on a national basis is required for<br />

overlapping coverage areas of SSR. Essentially, this means tailoring the pulse rate to<br />

factors such as: the technology of the SSR (Mode S, MSSR, Mode S Enhanced<br />

Surveillance); the coverage required; and the SSRs in the vicinity. Allied to plot plan<br />

processing techniques, this should assist in reducing the number of invalid responses<br />

being processed by the ground system.<br />

3.3.6 Possible Improvements to existing technology<br />

The development of monopulse SSR (MSSR) has led to a reduction in the FRUIT levels<br />

throughout Europe. Its implementation highlights an issue for the development of the<br />

technology – many monopulse radars only supplemented their ‘sliding window’ equivalent<br />

when the existing radar was due to be replaced.<br />

Partly for this reason, mandates have been imposed by several States (Belgium, France,<br />

Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland) for Mode S Elementary<br />

Surveillance. The UK has plans for the implementation of Mode S SSR ground stations<br />

across its coverage area in the period up to 2010. An AIC has been circulated advising<br />

users of a possible mandate for Mode S Enhanced Surveillance in the 2005+ timeframe<br />

(along with France and Germany) and the CAA has initiated separate Regulatory Impact<br />

Assessments (RIAs) 3 for both the proposed implementation of Mode S Enhanced<br />

Surveillance for IFR GAT flights in designated TMA and En Route airspace from 31<br />

March 2005 and for the implementation of Mode S elementary surveillance for flights<br />

elsewhere from 31 March 2008. These RIAs are now at the second stage of consultation.<br />

This gradual shift from MSSR Mode A/C to Mode S should mean a reduction in the RF<br />

interference level. The use of selective addressing (and lockout protocols) mean that<br />

interrogations happen only once per cycle with Mode S (decreasing the second replies<br />

and FRUIT). Also, use of the ICAO 24-bit address, which can be correlated with the Flight<br />

ID, means that each aircraft is uniquely identified, leading to less confusion and possible<br />

extra transmission of SPIs (special position indicator).<br />

However, Mode S Enhanced Surveillance, as is planned in France, Germany and the UK<br />

by 2005, will include a greater amount of data extracted from the transponder in the form<br />

of Downlinked Aircraft Parameters (DAPs). The development of ADS-B (1090ES) may<br />

make this redundant (as the information could be broadcast from the aircraft), but the<br />

level of in-band interference will still be affected.<br />

In summary, the technology in the short-term will improve, leading to a more efficient use<br />

of the available spectrum. However, as extra data is transmitted over the frequency and<br />

the traffic density increases in the medium-term, in-band efficiency may decrease to a<br />

level unsustainable for some ‘safety-of-life’ applications.<br />

3 An RIA is a policy tool that assesses the impact, in terms of costs, benefits and risks of<br />

any proposed regulation. It is intended to improve the quality of advice to Ministers and<br />

encourages informed debate. Part of the RIA process is to conduct full public<br />

consultation.<br />

Page 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!