06.02.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

FINAL REPORT - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• To identify offshore oil platforms and similar structures;<br />

• To identify and warn of environmentally-sensitive areas (such as coral reefs);<br />

• To mark new and uncharted hazards;<br />

• To identify centre and turning points.<br />

RACON range is approximately line-of-sight range, normally over 15 nautical miles,<br />

although actual range depends upon a number of factors, including mounting height,<br />

atmospheric conditions, and racon receiver sensitivity setting.<br />

RACONs can be placed on any navigational mark (lighthouses, beacons, perches, buoys,<br />

etc). The return on the ship’s radar will clearly identify the mark from surrounding targets<br />

and allow the mariner to accurately measure his range and bearing.<br />

4.2.2.2 Operational Requirements<br />

There are approximately 1,000 racons in operation in and around the UK.<br />

4.2.2.3 Regulatory and Standardisation Issues<br />

The ITU-R Recommendation M.824-2, Technical Parameters for Radar Beacons<br />

(RACONs) specifies the minimum technical characteristics for general purpose RACONs<br />

and contains guidance for their use.<br />

A recommended specification for RACONs is published (reference R-101r1) by the<br />

International Association of Maritime Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities<br />

(IALA).<br />

4.2.2.4 Possible Improvements to existing technology<br />

The IMO sub-committee on safety of navigation in a report on a review of performance<br />

standards for radar equipment 16 states that:<br />

“It is perceived that the requirement to trigger SARTs and RACONs of current designs<br />

imposes constraints on radar design. These constraints, when coupled with future ITU<br />

requirements to restrict out of band emissions, may result in increased costs and<br />

complexity of equipment. Whilst compatibility with SARTs 17 at X-band must remain until a<br />

replacement beacon is mandated by IMO, it is considered that the requirement to operate<br />

RACONs at S-band can be removed from the mandatory performance requirements and<br />

thus allow innovative design of radar operating in this band.”<br />

It is clear, therefore, that the maritime community appreciates the need to improve the<br />

performance and spectral efficiency of maritime radars and the proposed removal of the<br />

need to support RACONs in S-Band would enable new technologies to be employed.<br />

Implementing this recommendation is unlikely to have a major financial or operational<br />

impact on the maritime industry. RACONs currently operate in both bands, and most<br />

organisations who implement them provide RACONs in both S- and X-bands. As X-band<br />

is the most common form of radar (and indeed at least one radar on a GMDSS compliant<br />

vessel must work in X-band) the removal of S-band RACONs would appear to be a logical<br />

step forward to allow the development of more efficient maritime radars in S-band.<br />

16<br />

Reference: NAV49/9<br />

17<br />

SARTs do not operate on S-Band frequencies<br />

Page 132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!