11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210<br />

W. Van Paepegem, I. De Baere, E. Lamkanfi et al.<br />

composites is still to establish the S-N curve for that particular composite. The efforts to<br />

combine such fatigue tests with a variety of online and offline monitoring techniques and<br />

detailed numerical simulations of the experimental boundary conditions and observed<br />

material degradation, are much more limited.<br />

This paper wants to give a general overview of the different types of fatigue tests, the<br />

available online and offline monitoring techniques and the indispensable need of finite<br />

element calculations to understand the outcomes of these tests. As such, it should become<br />

clear that one single experimental fatigue test, if properly instrumented and simulated, can<br />

provide a lot more information about the fatigue behaviour of the tested composite material.<br />

The next paragraphs will discuss:<br />

• the different fatigue test set-ups and related online monitoring techniques,<br />

• the inspection of fatigue damage,<br />

• the finite element simulation of experimental boundary conditions.<br />

2. Fatigue Test Set-ups and Online Monitoring Techniques<br />

In this paragraph, a general overview of the most relevant fatigue test set-ups is given:<br />

(i) tension-tension fatigue, (ii) bending fatigue, and (iii) shear dominated fatigue. The related<br />

online monitoring techniques are discussed and some examples of measurements are briefly<br />

presented.<br />

An elaborate discussion of all types of fatigue testing, including tension-compression<br />

fatigue, biaxial fatigue and torsional fatigue, can be found elsewhere [1].<br />

2.1. Tension-Tension Fatigue<br />

The uni-axial tension-tension fatigue test is the most widely used fatigue test. The coupon<br />

geometry is a parallel-sided specimen, instrumented with tabs. The choice of the tabbing<br />

material differs among the testing laboratories. Some prefer steel or aluminium tabs, but most<br />

of them use glass/epoxy tabs, where the glass reinforcement has a [+45°/-45°]ns stacking<br />

sequence. In most cases, the tabs are straight-sided non-tapered tabs.<br />

A fatigue test is usually conducted with a servo-hydraulic testing machine, equipped with<br />

grips that clamp the specimen. The alignment of the specimen is very important. No bending<br />

loads must be induced in the specimen due to misalignment.<br />

In tension-tension fatigue tests, the stress ratio R (= σmin/σmax) is often chosen to be 0.1.<br />

The test frequency is always chosen as high as possible to limit the duration of the test and<br />

minimize the cost, but the fatigue response of some composites strongly depends on the<br />

frequency (especially in case of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics).<br />

In the international standards, the number of cycles to failure is considered as the main<br />

outcome of the tension-tension fatigue test. Yet it is worth the effort to use online<br />

instrumentation methods.<br />

The most simple and effective online measurement is the axial stiffness evolution. The<br />

axial stiffness can be directly calculated from the axial stress (loadcell) and the axial strain<br />

(extensometer). The axial strain must never be calculated from the axial displacement and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!