11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optimization of Laminated <strong>Composite</strong> Structures… 55<br />

x2<br />

(k)<br />

*<br />

X<br />

* global<br />

X<br />

no<br />

(k)<br />

X<br />

Initial design<br />

End<br />

yes<br />

* local<br />

X<br />

g j (X)<br />

Approximated optimization problem<br />

Solution of the approximated problem<br />

Optimal design ?<br />

~ ( k)<br />

g j ( X)<br />

Figure 2.3. Definition of an approximated optimization problem based on the information at the current<br />

design point x (k) . The corresponding feasible domain is defined by the constraints of (2.2).<br />

Each function entering the problem (2.1) is replaced by a convex approximation<br />

~ ( k)<br />

g j ( X)<br />

based on a Taylor series expansion in terms of the direct design variables x i or<br />

intermediate ones as for example the inverse design variables 1 xi<br />

. For a current design x (k)<br />

at iteration k, the approximated optimization problem writes:<br />

~<br />

~ ( k)<br />

min g0<br />

( x)<br />

( k)<br />

max<br />

g j ( x ) ≤ g j<br />

j = 1,...,<br />

m<br />

(2.2)<br />

( k)<br />

( k)<br />

xi ≤ xi<br />

≤ xi<br />

i = 1,...,<br />

n<br />

where the symbol ~ is related to an approximated function. The explicit and convex<br />

optimization problem (2.2) is itself solved by dedicated methods of mathematical<br />

x1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!