11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T300 fibers<br />

(Soden et al.,<br />

1998;<br />

Agbossou and<br />

Pastor, 1997)<br />

N5208 epoxy<br />

matrix (Tsai,<br />

1987;<br />

Agbossou and<br />

Pastor, 1997)<br />

Multi-scale Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced <strong>Composite</strong> Parts… 11<br />

Table 1. Hygro-thermo-mechanical properties of T300/5208 constituents.<br />

ρ<br />

[g/cm 3 ]<br />

Y 1<br />

[GPa]<br />

Y 2, Y3<br />

[GPa]<br />

ν12<br />

ν<br />

13<br />

G23<br />

[GPa]<br />

G 12<br />

[GPa]<br />

M11<br />

[10 -6 /K]<br />

M22, M 33<br />

[10 -6 /K]<br />

11 22 β , β<br />

1200 230 15 0.2 7 15 -1.5 27 0<br />

1867 4.5 4.5 0.4 6.4 6.4 60 60 0.6<br />

The calculations were achieved assuming that the reinforcements exhibit fiber-like<br />

morphology with an infinite length axis parallel to the longitudinal direction of the ply. For<br />

the determination of the CME, a perfect adhesion between the carbon fibers and the resin was<br />

assumed. Moreover, it also was assumed that the fibers do not absorb any moisture. Thus, the<br />

ratio between the pseudo-macroscopic and the macroscopic moisture contents is deduced<br />

from the expression given in (Loos and Springer, 1981):<br />

m<br />

I<br />

I<br />

ρ<br />

m m<br />

ΔC<br />

= (16)<br />

ΔC v ρ<br />

where ρ stands for the densities. The macroscopic density can be deduced form the classical<br />

rule of mixture:<br />

I m m r r<br />

= v ρ v ρ<br />

(17)<br />

ρ +<br />

The equations required for achieving Mori-Tanaka estimations involve relations (8-17).<br />

For the purpose of the strain localization, the embedding constituent was considered to be the<br />

epoxy matrix, whatever the considered volume fraction of reinforcements (thus, the<br />

e m<br />

transformation rule L = L was considered to be valid in any case). Figure 1 also reports<br />

the numerical results obtained through Kröner-Eshelby Self-Consistent model (1-3, 6-10, 16-<br />

17), in the same conditions (identical inclusion morphology and constituents properties as for<br />

Mori-Tanaka computations).<br />

β<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!