11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recent Advances in Discontinuously Reinforced Aluminum… 283<br />

Table 1. Tensile properties of Al-based micro- and nanocomposites [41].<br />

Specimen<br />

Tensile Strength,<br />

MPa<br />

Yield Strength,<br />

MPa<br />

Elongation at<br />

Break, %<br />

Pure Al 70 30 ---<br />

Al/15 vol.% SiC (3.5 μm) 176 94 14.5<br />

Al/1 vol.% Si3N4 (15 nm) 180 144 17.4<br />

Al/1 vol.% Si-N-C (25 nm) 178 134 19.7<br />

Al/5 vol.% Si-N-C (25 nm) 153 114 6.2<br />

It is widely known that DRA microcomposites exhibit higher creep resistance than their<br />

unreinforced matrix materials because the particulates acting as barriers to dislocation<br />

movement. There is no plastic flow occurs within ceramic reinforcing particles. Accordingly,<br />

plastic deformation of DRA composites is controlled exclusively by flow in the metallic<br />

matrices. The high temperature creep behavior of coarse-grained Al and its alloys reinforced<br />

with microparticles is characterized by high values of n and Q. The creep activation energy of<br />

microcomposites is often much larger than that for aluminum lattice self-diffusion (142<br />

kJ/mol) [42-45]. Such anomalous behavior can be rationalized by introducing a threshold<br />

stress (σo) opposing creep flow. In this respect, the observed creep deformation is not driven<br />

by the applied stress σ but rather by an effective stress σc (σc = σ -σo). The threshold stress<br />

may originate from several sources such as Orowan bowing between particles, attractive<br />

attraction between dislocations and particles as well as back-stress associated with local<br />

dislocation climb [5, 42]. The rate controlling equation can be written as follows:<br />

σ −σ<br />

o n Q<br />

ε& = A(<br />

) exp( − )<br />

[1]<br />

G RT<br />

where ε& is the creep rate, A is a constant, G is shear modulus, R is Universal gas constant<br />

and T is absolute temperature. The creep behavior of Al-based microcomposites is related to<br />

modified creep behavior of aluminum solid solution alloys, and the equations developed for<br />

solid solution alloys can be used to described the creep behavior of composites provided that<br />

the applied stress is replaced by an effective stress. Thus, the threshold stress for creep in Albased<br />

microcomposites is associated with interactions between dislocations and fine<br />

dispersion of particles. These particles may be fine oxides in PM MMCs or precipitates in the<br />

matrix alloy of cast composites [42-44]. Introducing a threshold stress and its temperature<br />

dependence into the creep rate analysis yields a true stress exponent, n, of 3, 5 or 8, and true<br />

creep activation energy. For composites with a true exponent close to 3, dislocation viscous<br />

glide is rate controlling with an activation energy for creep is associated with interdiffusion of<br />

the solute atoms. On the other hand, dislocation climb process predominates for n = 5 in<br />

which the activation energy for creep is associated with aluminum lattice self-diffusion. For<br />

the composites with a true exponent close to 8, creep deformation is controlled by the lattice<br />

diffusion and its rate is proportional to the third power of substructure grain size λ [45, 46].<br />

Mathematically, the phenomenological creep rate equation for n = 8 can be written as:<br />

ε& = S (DL/b 2 ) (λ/b) 3 [(σ- σo)/E] 8 [2]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!