11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Research</strong> Directions in the Fatigue Testing of Polymer <strong>Composite</strong>s 215<br />

• the bending moment is (piecewise) linear along the length of the specimen (3-point<br />

bending, 4-point bending, cantilever beam bending). Hence stresses, strains and<br />

damage distribution vary along the gauge length of the specimen. On the contrary,<br />

with tension/compression fatigue experiments, the stresses, strains and damage are<br />

assumed to be equal in each cross-section of the specimen,<br />

• due to the continuous stress redistribution, the neutral fibre (as defined in the classic<br />

beam theory) is moving in the cross-section because of changing damage<br />

distributions. Once a small area inside the composite material has moved for example<br />

from the compressive side to the tensile side, the damage behaviour of that area is<br />

altered considerably,<br />

• the finite element implementation of related damage models gives rise to several<br />

complications, because each material point is loaded with a different stress, strain<br />

and possibly stress ratio, so that damage growth can be different for each material<br />

point. In tension/compression fatigue tests, the stress- or strain-amplitude is constant<br />

during fatigue life and differential equations describing decrease of stiffness or<br />

strength, can often be simply integrated over the considered number of loading<br />

cycles,<br />

• smaller forces and larger displacements in bending allow a more slender design of<br />

the fatigue testing facility.<br />

Basically, three types of bending fatigue tests can be distinguished: (i) three-point<br />

bending [24,25], (ii) four-point bending [26], and (iii) cantilever bending [22,27-30]. The<br />

success of these tests for fatigue of polymer composites is quite limited, because the<br />

interpretation of the results is more difficult and in case of stiffness degradation, stress<br />

redistribution across the specimen height comes into play.<br />

Moreover, as long as the bending stiffness of the laminate is high enough (e.g. sandwich<br />

composites), the deflections are small and linear beam theory still applies, but once that the<br />

bending stiffness of the composite decreases (e.g. thin laminates), the deflections are large<br />

and geometric nonlinearities and friction at the roller supports affect the fatigue results.<br />

The authors designed a test set-up for cantilever bending fatigue tests as depicted in<br />

Figure 7.<br />

The power of the motor is transmitted by a V-belt to a second shaft. The second shaft<br />

bears a mechanism with crank and connecting rod, which imposes an alternating<br />

displacement on the hinge (point C in Figure 7) that connects the connecting rod with the<br />

lower clamp of the composite specimen. At the upper end the specimen is clamped (point A<br />

in Figure 7). Hence the sample is loaded as a composite cantilever beam.<br />

A full Wheatstone bridge on the connecting rod is used to measure the force acting on the<br />

composite specimen. Due to the (bending) stiffness degradation of the specimen during<br />

fatigue life, the measured force will gradually decrease as the amplitude umax of the prescribed<br />

displacement remains constant. In order to record the out-of-plane displacement profile, it<br />

was necessary to develop a mechanism to hold the specimen fixed in this state, because<br />

recording the profile while the test keeps running at a frequency of 2.2 Hz, gives rise to some<br />

practical problems. A rotary digital encoder was attached to the second shaft. Its angular<br />

position (relative to a certain reference angle) is directly related with the loading path of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!