11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Damage Variables in Impact Testing of <strong>Composite</strong> Laminates 251<br />

perforation (Figure 13), the DD data show an initial decrease thus suggesting a reduction in<br />

the percentage of impact energy that the laminate is able to absorb. For the thicker laminate<br />

(GVP90_12.31), this initial reduction is quite significant, going from a percentage of energy<br />

absorption of about 85% in the first impact to a quite stable value of about 70% in subsequent<br />

tests. Visual observation of the laminate after each impact pointed out that in the first few<br />

impacts the impactor indents the laminate and that the size of this indentation does not<br />

significantly change in subsequent tests. Existence of an initial localized damage that does not<br />

appear to significantly grow in subsequent tests is also what is conveyed by the DuI as well as<br />

the DI data, which keep to a constant low level throughout the test.<br />

DD, DI<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

DD DI<br />

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40<br />

Impact Number<br />

Figure 13a. Comparison between DD and DI data in repeated impact tests performed on CE90m_4.00<br />

laminates. Impact energy: 24.5 J.<br />

DD, DI<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

DD DI<br />

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40<br />

Impact Number<br />

Figure 13b. Comparison between DD and DI data in repeated impact tests performed on GVP90_12.31<br />

laminates. Impact energy: 24.5 J.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!