11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74<br />

Michaël Bruyneel<br />

It results that robust approximation schemes must be available to efficiently optimize<br />

laminated structures. The characteristics of such a reliable approximation are explained in the<br />

following, and tests are carried out to show the efficiency and the applicability of the method.<br />

7. Optimization Algorithm for Industrial Applications<br />

7.1. The Approximation Concepts Approach<br />

In the approximation concepts approach, the solution of the primary optimization problem<br />

(2.1) is replaced with a sequence of explicit approximated problems generated through first<br />

order Taylor series expansion of the structural functions in terms of specific intermediate<br />

variables (e.g. direct xi or inverse 1/xi variables). The generated structural approximations<br />

built from the information known at least at the current design point (via a finite element<br />

analysis), are convex and separable. As will be explained latter a dual formulation can then be<br />

used in a very efficient way for solving each explicit approximated problem.<br />

According to section 2, it is apparent that the approximation concepts approach is well<br />

adapted to structural optimization including sizing, shape and topology optimization<br />

problems. However, the use of the existing schemes (section 7.2) can sometimes lead to bad<br />

approximations of the structural responses and slow convergence (or no convergence at all)<br />

can occur (Figure 7.1).<br />

x2<br />

* global<br />

X<br />

(k ) *<br />

X<br />

x2<br />

(k )<br />

X<br />

* global<br />

X<br />

* local<br />

X<br />

(k ) *<br />

X<br />

x1<br />

x2<br />

* global<br />

X<br />

a. A too conservative approximation b. A too few conservative approximation and unfeasible intermediate<br />

solutions c. An approximation not adapted to the problem, leading to zigzagging<br />

* local<br />

X<br />

Figure 7.1. Difficulties appearing in the approximation of highly non linear structural responses.<br />

x1<br />

(k ) *<br />

X<br />

(k )<br />

X<br />

* local<br />

X<br />

x1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!