11.02.2013 Views

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

Composite Materials Research Progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Damage Variables in Impact Testing of <strong>Composite</strong> Laminates 239<br />

E<br />

propagation<br />

DuI = (1)<br />

E<br />

initiation<br />

where Einitiation and Epropagation correspond to the energies absorbed before and after Fpeak,<br />

respectively.<br />

The ductility index is small for brittle materials, where most of the energy is absorbed<br />

before Fpeak, and high for ductile materials, where most of the energy is absorbed after Fpeak is<br />

exceeded. The energy absorption mechanisms before Fpeak are crazing and microcracking of<br />

the matrix; whereas, after Fpeak, crack growth is observed via fiber pull-out, fiber/matrix<br />

debonding and fiber fracture [26-29].<br />

Other energy variables have been introduced since the DuI to rank impact performance.<br />

In [12-13] Belingardi and Vadori introduced the Damage Degree (DD) defined as the ratio<br />

between the absorbed energy (Ea) and the impact energy (Ei). Ei is the kinetic energy of the<br />

impactor right before contact takes place and it is indeed the energy introduced into the<br />

specimen. Ea can be calculated from the force-displacement curve as the area surrounded by<br />

the curve in case of closed force-displacement curves (impact event with rebound) or the area<br />

bounded by the force-displacement curve up to a constant level of force and the horizontal<br />

axis in case of open force-displacement curves (impact event with no rebound). Based on the<br />

energy viewpoint, penetration should take place the first time Ea reaches Ei. Therefore the DD<br />

is below one for impact events with rebound while it reaches the value of one in case the<br />

impactor is stopped with no rebound or specimen penetration is achieved. In [13-14], it was<br />

shown that the relationship between the DD and the impact energy increases monotonically<br />

until saturation and a fairly good data interpolation was achieved by a linear regression curve<br />

[14]. A saturation energy level (Esa) was defined as the impact energy at which the DD<br />

regression curve reaches the value of one. This energy threshold is of practical and theoretical<br />

interest since it defines the maximum energy level the laminate can dissipate with no<br />

penetration and by means of internal damage mechanisms only [12]. In synthesis, the DD is<br />

defined as:<br />

In [17,18], Liu proposed a second-order polynomial regression curve to describe the<br />

absorbed energy vs. impact energy curve up to penetration (named by Liu the energy profile):<br />

2<br />

Ea = aEi<br />

+ bEi<br />

+ c<br />

Depending on the laminate under study, the linear term and the constant c can be smaller<br />

than the quadratic term so that equation (2) can be simplified as:<br />

a<br />

2<br />

i<br />

(2)<br />

E ≅ aE<br />

(3)<br />

From the energy profile, Liu was able to define a Penetration Threshold (Pn) (in a series<br />

of “continuous” impacts at increasing impact energies, it represents the first condition of no<br />

impactor rebound and therefore of equality between impact and absorbed energy), and a<br />

Perforation Threshold (Pr) (first condition of laminate complete perforation). Between the<br />

penetration and perforation thresholds, there exists a range, named by Liu “the range of the<br />

penetration process”, in which the impact energy and the absorbed energy are equal to each

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!