IV Edición Revista Derecho en Sociedad - Ulacit
IV Edición Revista Derecho en Sociedad - Ulacit
IV Edición Revista Derecho en Sociedad - Ulacit
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DERECHO EN SOCIEDAD, N. º 4 . Enero del 2013<br />
<strong>Revista</strong> electrónica de la Facultad de <strong>Derecho</strong>, ULACIT – Costa Rica<br />
judges that court system offers. As a consequ<strong>en</strong>ce, each dispute that is to be v<strong>en</strong>tilated in <br />
Arbitration Proceedings will have an specific panel to deal with the complications of the <br />
case. H<strong>en</strong>ce, the constitution of the tribunal is of vital relevance. <br />
Parties have in mind one thing: winning the case 36 . It would be naïve to think otherwise. <br />
The repercussion of selecting a non-‐biased arbitrator over a biased one is determinative of <br />
the dispute, because acting in one way or another will affect the arbitrator`s credibility, and <br />
in last instance, his or her capacity to persuade his or her colleagues. <br />
Arbitrators that form part of Tribunals in International and Local Arbitrations, are <br />
expected to be neutral 37 , indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t and impartial. The common sc<strong>en</strong>ario is to have a <br />
tripartite panel, where each side of the equation has selected one, and the two party <br />
appointed arbitrators agree in the name of the chairperson. The parties are jointly <br />
responsible for the costs of all three arbitrators, subject to any ultimate allocation of costs. <br />
Furthermore, all of the three arbitrators are expected to be neutral, indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t and <br />
impartial. <br />
For the appointing party, the selection of an arbitrator will consume a considerable amount <br />
of time 38 , research about the capacities of pot<strong>en</strong>tials arbitrators will be necessary previous <br />
the appointm<strong>en</strong>t. Not to forget, that the nominee has to understand the factual issues that <br />
are going to be pres<strong>en</strong>ted. Furthermore, it is logical that the appointing party will try to <br />
select an arbitrator that will be sympathetic to the appointing party views, which does not <br />
necessary means that will not be carrying all of its duties with dilig<strong>en</strong>ce, impartiality, <br />
indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce, and neutrality. <br />
36 Paulsson, Jan (2010) 'Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution' 25 ICSID Review, at 11. <br />
37 Of course, like everything in life, there are exceptions. In the United States of America, there exists a <br />
somewhat common practice of having non neutral arbitrators panel, to resolve the disputes. For further <br />
information, please refer to Chernick R.; Gaitis J.M.; Davidson R.B. (2006) 'Non Neutral Arbitrators' 3 <br />
Transnational Dispute Journal. <br />
38 Guides for the proper selction of arbitratos has be<strong>en</strong> created by practitioners. One of this was created by <br />
Bishop and Reed, supra note 10. <br />
87