Vergleichende Untersuchung konventioneller und digitaler intraoraler

ANDERSON C. (1994):
Easy-to-alter digital images raise fears of tampering.
Science 263:317-318
APOGEE (2000):
Pixel Binning.
[Internet: www.apogee-ccd.com/ccd103.html]
APOGEE (2001a):
Blooming vs. Anti-Blooming.
[Internet: www.apogee-ccd.com/ccd102.html]
APOGEE (2001b):
System Gain.
[Internet: www.apogee-ccd.com/ccd104.html]
162
Literaturverzeichnis
ARAKI K., A. ENDO u. T. OKANO (2000):
An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric
properties and resolution.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:76-80
ATTAELMANAN A., E. BORG u. H. G. GRONDAHL (2000):
Digitisation and display of intra-oral films.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:97-102
ATTAELMANAN A. G., E. BORG u. H. G. GRONDAHL (1999):
Assessments of the physical performance of 2 generations of 2 direct digital intraoral
sensors.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:517-523
ATTAELMANAN A. G., E. BORG u. H. G. GRONDAHL (2001):
Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91:611-615
BATENBURG R. H., H. J. MEIJER, W. G. GERAETS u. P. F. VAN DER STELT
(1998):
Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants
supporting mandibular overdentures.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:221-224
BEIDEMAN R. W., O. N. JOHNSON u. R. W. ALCOX (1976):
A study to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiographs submitted to a
third party carrier.
J Am Dent Assoc 93:1010-1013