03.03.2013 Views

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9<br />

After the war, BAS expansion: 1983-87<br />

A<br />

fter the Falkl<strong>and</strong>s War the Government announced an increase in the BAS<br />

budget of £5 million, earmarked for an exp<strong>and</strong>ed programme of research, <strong>and</strong><br />

including provision for improved logistics agreed with NERC. Although I,<br />

with the help of my staff <strong>and</strong> John Heap at the Foreign Office drew up the proposals<br />

in the programme, against some opposition, it was known as "the Bondi<br />

Programme"! Bondi was succeeded by Hugh Fish <strong>and</strong> he prompted by John Bowman<br />

did his best to frustrate my efforts. <strong>Research</strong> Council politics caused us great<br />

difficulties <strong>and</strong> the last four years of my Directorship were spent fighting to keep the<br />

money without which we would have been on a declining budget in real terms <strong>and</strong><br />

unable to carry out the exp<strong>and</strong>ed programme.<br />

The financial rules were changed, the goal posts moved, so that it was clear that<br />

far from an increased overall budget, we would be on a declining budget in real<br />

terms <strong>and</strong> unable to carry out the exp<strong>and</strong>ed programme. This was because it was<br />

claimed that the baseline budget (then about £7 million annually) was not "ringfenced".<br />

Up till then extra capital needs - e.g., for building UK laboratories <strong>and</strong><br />

offices, rebuilding a base, replacing a ship or aircraft - had always been provided<br />

outside the baseline budget, by NERC making a special case for extra funds, the<br />

"PESC round". Now I was told that we would have to make provision for such needs<br />

from within the overall budget. It was clear to me that NERC saw the extra funds as<br />

being there to help them with their overall financial problems - robbing Peter to pay<br />

Paul.<br />

It soon became clear that BAS would not be able to implement the new<br />

programme agreed at Cabinet level, unless these NERC decisions, changing the<br />

ground rules, could be reversed. Over several years I failed to persuade Fish <strong>and</strong><br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!