03.03.2013 Views

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

Part III: Antarctica and Academe - Scott Polar Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Antarctic which was agreed at the Second CSAGI Conference, when the location of<br />

35 Antarctic stations, with additional opportunities for biological <strong>and</strong> medical<br />

research, <strong>and</strong> geology, was decided. It is said that Belousov, the Soviet delegate to<br />

that meeting, arriving 3 days late, said the USSR would put a station at the South<br />

Pole, only to be told that it had already been agreed that the Americans would have<br />

the Pole site. The Soviets decided, that being the case, to go for the Pole of<br />

Inaccessibility (Robin, pers. comm.), which is the location of Vostok Station <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Vostok ice core.<br />

As the initial discussions proceeded interest in the scientific potential of<br />

<strong>Antarctica</strong> grew, so much so that in December l956 the US National Committee made<br />

a proposal to CSAGI, namely that the IGY Antarctic programme should continue for<br />

an additional year, to realize the full scientific benefit from the large investment in<br />

stations <strong>and</strong> equipment made by the twelve nations participating in the programme.<br />

The Fourth CSAGI Conference, met in Paris, 13-15 June l957, when a resolution was<br />

adopted:<br />

THE FOURTH ANTARCTIC CONFERENCE<br />

CONSIDERING the scientific importance of further observations in the Antarctic<br />

after the end of the IGY to best achieve the scientific investigations carried out on this<br />

occasion <strong>and</strong> to make use of the investments <strong>and</strong> observations made at the various<br />

stations<br />

RECOMMENDS that the Bureau of ICSU at its next meeting forwards to the<br />

ICSU Executive Board the recommendation expressed as follows:<br />

That ICSU appoints a scientific committee to examine the merits of further<br />

investigations in the Antarctic, covering the entire field of science <strong>and</strong> to make<br />

proposals to ICSU on the best way to achieve such a programme. That in view of the<br />

desirability of avoiding an interruption in the current series of IGY investigations in<br />

<strong>Antarctica</strong>, ICSU takes immediate action in order that the finding be available by the<br />

middle of August.<br />

The resolution was sent to the Executive Board of ICSU which endorsed it on 28<br />

June l957, <strong>and</strong> an ad hoc investigating Committee was created to flesh it out. The<br />

convenor was to be designated by the Bureau of ICSU, <strong>and</strong> each country carrying out<br />

or contemplating scientific operations in <strong>Antarctica</strong> would nominate a delegate - "to<br />

be a scientist already familiar with Antarctic problems".<br />

This committee met in Stockholm on 9-11 September l957, <strong>and</strong> "considered in<br />

detail some representative branches of Antarctic research: meteorology, aurora <strong>and</strong><br />

geomagnetism, glaciology, <strong>and</strong> oceanography." Among the outst<strong>and</strong>ing problems<br />

which an additional year of observations would help to solve were: "independent<br />

warming at many stations in the Ross Sea <strong>and</strong> Byrd L<strong>and</strong>" was associated with<br />

observed decrease in stratospheric temperatures in early winter; the question was<br />

"whether this was a normal situation <strong>and</strong> if so would it mean that the ozonesphere in<br />

the Antarctic is more cut off from the surrounding atmosphere than is the<br />

troposphere?" (This later came to known as the polar vortex, where the "ozone hole"<br />

320

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!