ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

Recommendations

Info

104 ■ THE <strong>ECONOMICS</strong> OF <strong>UNIQUENESS</strong> Diamond, P., and J. A. Hausman. 1994. “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Th an No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 45–65. Do, A. Q., R. W. Wilbur, and J. L. Short. 1994. “An Empirical Examination of the Externalities of Neighborhood Churches on Housing Values.” Th e Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 9: 127–136. Dunse, N., and C. Jones. 1998. “A Hedonic Price Model of Offi ce Rents.” Journal of Property Valuation and Investment 16: 297–312. Eilon, S. 1972. “Goals and Constraints in Decision-Making.” In Accounting for Social Goals, ed. J. L. Livingstone and S. C. Gunn, 218–230. New York: Harper & Row. Ford, D. A. 1989. “Th e Eff ect of Historic District Designation on Single-Family Home Prices.” Real Estate Economics 17: 353–362. Fromm, G., and P. Tauber. 1973. Public Economic Th eory and Policy. New York: MacMillan. Fusco Girard, L. 1987. Risorse Architettoniche e Culturali. Milano: Franco Angeli. Glaeser, E. L, J. Kolko, and A. Saiz. 2001. “Consumer City.” Journal of Economic Geography 1: 27–50. Greenley, D. A., R. G. Walsh, and R. A. Young. 1981. “Option Value: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 657–673. Hagerhall, C. M. 2000. “Clustering Predictors of Landscape Preference in the Traditional Swedish Cultural Landscape.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 83–90. Hoevenagel, R. 1994. Th e Contingent Valuation Method: Scope and Validity. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. Hough, D. E., and C. G. Kratz. 1983. “Can ‘Good’ Architecture Meet the Market Test?” Journal of Urban Economics 14: 40–54. Hubbard, P. 1993. “Th e Value of Conservation.” Town Planning Review 64 (4): 359–373. Hyman, E. L., and M. M. Hufschmidt. 1983. “Th e Relevance of Natural Resource Economics in Environmental Planning.” Working paper, Th e East-West Centre, Honolulu. Kahneman, D., and J. L. Knetsch. 1992. “Valuing Public Goods: Th e Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Th aler. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Eff ect and the Coase Th eorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Th aler. 1991. “Anomalies: Th e Endowment Eff ect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206. Kalman, H. 1980. Th e Evaluation of Historic Buildings. Ottawa: Ministry of Environment. Klamer, A., and P. W. Zuidhof. 1999. “Th e Values of Cultural Heritage: Merging Economic and Cultural Appraisals.” Economics and Heritage Conservation: A Meeting Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute, December 1998, ed. R. Mason, 23–61. Los Angeles: Getty Institute. Lazrak, F., P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, and J. Rouwendal. 2009. “Cultural Heritage: Hedonic Prices for Non-Market Values.” In Markets and Politics, ed. W. Schäfer, A. Schneider, and T. Th omas, 285–299. Maiburg: Metropolis. Lazrak, F., P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, and J. Rouwendal. 2011a. “Cultural Heritage and Creative Cities: An Economic Evaluation Perspective.” In Sustainable City and Creativity, ed. L. Fusco Girard, and P. Nijkamp. 225–245. Aldershot: Ashgate. Lazrak, F., P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, and J. Rouwendal. 2011b. “Th e Market Value of Listed Heritage.” Research Paper, Dept. of Spatial Economics, VU University, Amsterdam.
ECONOMIC VALUATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE ■ 105 Leichenko, R. M., N. E. Coulson, and D. Listokin. 2001. “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: An Analysis of Texas Cities.” Urban Studies 38: 19–73. Lichfi eld, N. 1989. Economics in Urban Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. Little, I. M. D., and J. A. Mirrlees. 1974. Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. London: Heineman Educational Books. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Moorhouse, J. C., and M. S. Smith. 1994. “Th e Market for Residential Architecture: 19th- Century Row Houses in Boston’s South End.” Journal of Urban Economics 35: 267–277. Morrison, G. C. 1997a. “Resolving Diff erences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Comment.” American Economic Review 87: 236–240. Morrison, G. C. 1997b. “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Some Evidence of an Endowment Eff ect.” Applied Economics 29: 411–417. Murphy, J. J., P. G. Allen, T. H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead. 2005. “A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30: 313–325. Navrud, S., and J. Strand. 1992. “Th e Preservation Value of Nidaros Cathedral.” Pricing the European Environment, ed. S. Navrud. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Navrud, S., and R. C. Ready, eds. 2002. Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Neuts, B., and P. Nijkamp. 2011a. “Strangers on the Move.” Research Paper, Dept. of Spatial Economic, VU University, Amsterdam, 2011a. Neuts, B., and P. Nijkamp. 2011b. “Crowding Perception in a Tourist City.” Research Paper, Dept. of Spatial Economics, VU University, Amsterdam. Nijkamp, P., and P. Riganti. 2008. “Assessing Cultural Heritage Benefi ts for Urban Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Services Technology and Management 10 (1): 29–38. Nijkamp, P., and P. Riganti. 2009. “Valuing Urban Cultural Heritage.” In Cultural Tourism and Sustainable Local Development, ed. L. Fusco Girard and P. Nijkamp, 57–72. Aldershot: Ashgate. Nijkamp, P., P. Rietveld, and H. Voogd. 1990. Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Noonan, D. S. 2003. “Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-analytic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Cultural Economics 27: 159–176. Noonan, D. S. 2007. “Finding an Impact of Preservation Policies: Price Eff ects of Historic Landmarks on Attached Homes in Chicago, 1990–1999.” Economic Development Quarterly 21: 17–33. Nunes, P. A. L. D., and E. Schokkaert. 2003. “Identifying the Warm Glow Eff ect in Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 231–245. Nunes, P. A. L. D., and P. Nijkamp. 2011. “Sustainable Biodiversity: Evaluation Lessons from Past Economic Research.” Regional Science Inquiry 2 (2): 13–4. Poor, P. J., and J. M. Smith. 2004. “Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: Th e Case of Historic St. Mary’s City of Maryland.” Journal of Cultural Economics 28: 217–229. Renard, R. 1986. “Th e Rise and Fall of Cost-Benefi t Analysis in Developing Countries.” Unpublished mimeograph, Department of Economics, Free University, Brussels.
Page 1:
Public Disclosure Authorized Public
Page 4 and 5:
Th e Urban Development Series discu
Page 6 and 7:
© 2012 International Bank for Reco
Page 8 and 9:
vi ■ CONTENTS Project Appraisal i
Page 10 and 11:
viii ■ CONTENTS Appendix II: Addi
Page 12 and 13:
x ■ CONTENTS 7.4 Tourism Is Coupl
Page 14 and 15:
xii ■ CONTENTS 9.1 How to Organiz
Page 17 and 18:
Exegi monumentum aere perennius reg
Page 19:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ■ xvii Cultural O
Page 22 and 23:
xx ■ OVERVIEW What Are the Object
Page 24 and 25:
xxii ■ OVERVIEW and captures the
Page 26 and 27:
xxiv ■ OVERVIEW periphery, especi
Page 28 and 29:
xxvi ■ OVERVIEW tourism—by impr
Page 30 and 31:
xxviii ■ OVERVIEW 3. Institutiona
Page 33 and 34:
1 Livable Historic City Cores and E
Page 35 and 36:
LIVABLE HISTORIC CITY CORES AND ENA
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
2 Investing in the Sense of Place:
Page 49 and 50:
INVESTING IN THE SENSE OF PLACE ■
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
0 45° INVESTING IN THE SENSE OF PL
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
FIGURE 2.4 continued INVESTING IN T
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
A Dubious Alternative: Property Rec
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75:
Page 78 and 79:
46 ■ THE ECONOMICS OF UNIQUENESS
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87: 54 ■ THE ECONOMICS OF UNIQUENESS
Page 130 and 131: TABLE 4.1 Overview of Hedonic Price
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
FIGURE 6.5 Quito and Oaxaca: Timeli
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
TABLE 6.5 Quito Investments in the
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 215 and 216:
7 UNESCO World Heritage List, Touri
Page 217 and 218:
UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST, TOURISM
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
TABLE 7.1 Regional and Historical D
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
TABLE 7.3 Benchmark Regressions Fir
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
TABLE 7.10 Robustness to Using Diff
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
8 Financial Mechanisms for Historic
Page 247 and 248:
FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HISTORIC C
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BOX 8.2 FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HI
Page 255 and 256:
BOX 8.3 FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HI
Page 257 and 258:
TABLE 8.1 Local Financial Tools Use
Page 259 and 260:
FIGURE 8.4 Brownfi eld Concession T
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 317 and 318:
Boxes, fi gures, maps, notes, and t
Page 319 and 320:
China. See also specifi c cities ac
Page 321 and 322:
public sector role, 222-26, 223b, 2
Page 323 and 324:
Kraay, A., 198 Kratz, C. G., 96 L l
Page 325 and 326:
Pine Ridge Reservation (U.S.), 238
Page 327 and 328:
Shaoxing, China, local residents re
Page 329 and 330:
urban economics appraisal approach,
Page 332:
ECO-AUDIT Environmental Benefits St
show all

ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?