ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS
ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS
ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
246 ■ THE <strong>ECONOMICS</strong> OF <strong>UNIQUENESS</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
“Venice is now becoming a very uncomfortable city, largely because there are so<br />
many tourists in the summer. [. . .] In another 20 or 30 years, it will actually be<br />
the thinking man’s Disneyland, a millionaires’ playground. But there won’t be any<br />
people there; it will just be a museum city.” 1 ( John Julius Norwich, history writer)<br />
“When a town is put on the World Heritage List, it means nothing should change.<br />
But we want development, more space, new appliances—things that are much<br />
more modern. We are angry about all that.” 2 (Abba Maiga, homeowner, speaking<br />
about the World Heritage city of Djenné in Mali)<br />
Both statements illustrate the intricacy and complexity of the challenges<br />
that World Heritage Sites face today. Some historic city cores suff er from<br />
excesses of mass tourism, despite the considerable potential for bringing economic<br />
returns, or fail to provide sound and balanced economic growth; yet<br />
others strive to be included on the United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and<br />
Cultural Organization (UNESCO) list of World Heritage Sites. Most local<br />
governments lack institutional capacity and/or funds to cope with preservation<br />
management activities necessary for upkeep of their heritage assets while<br />
simultaneously faced with the array of priority investments needed for social<br />
and economic development.<br />
Most experts concur that the protection and promotion of cultural heritage<br />
assets can be important to spur local economic development. Worldwide, institutions<br />
acknowledge today the need for a new urban strategy that includes cultural<br />
heritage serving as a platform or even acting as an engine of economic growth<br />
and sustainable urban development (World Bank 2009).<br />
Th e aim of this chapter is to contribute to the assessment of economic values<br />
in historic city core regeneration. 3 Th e focus is on the city, and on mapping<br />
its heritage values. “Th e cultural heritage nature of conservation in historic<br />
cities [. . .] adds a dimension that standard urban economics is ill-equipped to<br />
address. Many of the benefi ts of cultural heritage do not enter markets, or do<br />
so only imperfectly” (Serageldin 1999, 24). As a practical tool for spatial analysis,<br />
the mapping process of heritage economics aims to provide a common<br />
base for the array of specialists and stakeholders participating in the urban<br />
conservation process, including local and city administrators, tourism planners<br />
and managers, conservation specialists, experts, academics, residents,<br />
and local business.<br />
Th e mapping tools described in this chapter are intended as instruments and<br />
not products for their own sake. Th e use of mapping tools is rather an attempt<br />
to improve the understanding of the complexities of historic conservation in city<br />
cores, and develop better ways to implement policy measures. Examples with fi ctional<br />
and real maps are used to help illustrate the eff ectiveness of the mapping