09.03.2013 Views

ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAPPING HERITAGE <strong>ECONOMICS</strong> FOR SPATIAL ANALYSIS ■ 253<br />

the existence of the heritage), or bequest values (i.e., the value of passing<br />

inherited heritage to future generations). Mapping economic non-use values<br />

can be summarized by asking “the right question on the right heritage<br />

items to the right people.” Values are measured through multiple techniques,<br />

either revealed preference methods (e.g., impact analysis, hedonic price,<br />

travel cost) or stated preference methods (e.g., contingent valuation, choice<br />

modeling).<br />

One of the most popular methods for measuring stated preferences is<br />

the contingent valuation method, which aims to estimate residents’ willingness<br />

to pay for the conservation of the heritage (J. Paul Getty Trust 2000,<br />

74–76). Mapping the preferences requires that the survey specify some spatial<br />

attributes in the questionnaire.<br />

Th e mapping of the results could be two-fold:<br />

1. Preferences (hence, non-use values) are geo-referenced on maps; respondents’<br />

preferences are shown according to their place of residence. Map 9.1A<br />

shows a fi ctional example based on fi ve samples of residents covering diff erent<br />

neighborhoods in a city. People are asked to express their willingness to pay<br />

for the conservation of a monument in the city. Th e color-coded map shows<br />

diff erences between willingness to pay. It helps to identify awareness of, and<br />

concern for, the same heritage item among the inhabitants.<br />

2. Preferences are displayed on maps in terms of the heritage being surveyed.<br />

Map 9.1B shows a fi ctional example where willingness to pay is asked for three<br />

monuments. A color-coded map visualizes the discrepancy of willingness to<br />

pay between several heritage items (darker tones = higher values). A similar<br />

survey could be conducted among a sample of tourists or visitors, and results<br />

could be mapped similarly.<br />

Alternative measures for non-use values are made by the use of surrogate markets,<br />

revealing people’s preferences, and can be described as follows:<br />

• Hedonic pricing method aims to estimate non-use values as a quality-adjusted<br />

price or an implicit price. If people consider a heritage building as having<br />

twice the quality of regular houses, then the hedonic price must be twice the<br />

actual real estate price. Th e hedonic price is based on attributes that can be<br />

located specifi cally. Mapping non-use values with the hedonic price method<br />

involves selecting the buildings (or the parcels) with attributes (e.g., prestigious<br />

location, proximity to a monument, specifi c signifi cance or authenticity)<br />

and showing non-use values by identifying the parcels where hedonic<br />

prices diff er from the actual estate value.<br />

• Travel cost method uses the cost incurred by individuals for traveling to the<br />

city as implicit price. Th is method is rather applied to non-resident visitors<br />

on a regional scale. Color-coded maps indicate the accessibility to the city,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!