ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

Recommendations

Info

292 ■ INDEX Moorhouse, J. C., 97 Morocco, spatial analysis in, 256b Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, brownfi eld redevelopment in, 221b multicriteria analysis, 83–84, 90–91 N National College of Ireland, 11 National Institute of Anthropology and History of Mexico (INAH), 152 National Institute of Historic and Artistic Heritage of Brazil (IPHAN), 110, 152 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, U.S.), 93, 102n1 National Register of Historic Places (U.S.), 112, 116 National Restoration Fund (Netherlands), 235 National Round Table of the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE), 217 National Spatial Strategy (Ireland), 9 National Trust for Historic Preservation, 35 natural brownfi elds, 215 natural capital, 47, 48, 76–77 neighborhood characteristics, 125 Netherlands brownfi eld redevelopment fi nancing from, 221b urban development funds in, 234 New York (state), brownfi eld redevelopment in, 232 New York City private sector investment in, 35 quality of life ratings for, 280n7 NGOs. See nongovernmental organizations Nidaros Cathedral, Norway, 93 Nijkamp, Peter, 6, 75, 90 Ningbo, China, infrastructure upgrading in, 158b NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.), 93, 102n1 nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), 122, 125, 135, 140n8, 149 nonprofi t organizations, 63, 220 non-use values in environmental economics approach, 53b governance and, 146–47 heritage designations and, 109, 140n1 in heritage economics, 52 of mixed goods, 93 spatial analysis and, 249, 250, 251t, 252–54, 272, 275 travel cost method and, 95 Noonan, D. S., 96 Norwich, John Julius, 246 NRTEE (National Round Table of the Environment and the Economy), 217 O Oaxaca de Juarez, Mexico building stock condition in, 176t decision-making process in, 161, 162–67, 163–65f, 167t land uses in, 175f urban regeneration strategy in, 124–25 O’Brien, John, 1 occupancy rates, 113, 255 OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 5–6, 7 Old Town Development Agency (Vilnius, Lithuania), 64b Ontario, Canada, heritage designations in, 120, 120f opportunity cost, 46, 95 option value, 252 Oracle, 12 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 5–6, 7 Ost, Christian, 245 “Our Common Future” (Brundtland Report), 250 outside investors vs. local residents, 41–42 P Pagiola, Stefano, 53b Pakistan brownfi eld redevelopment in, 223b spatial analysis in, 259b Paris, France quality of life ratings for, 281n7 urban renewal in, 51 Peacock, Alan, 46 performance indicators analysis, 83 Peru, conservation progress in, 155 Philadelphia foreclosure rates in, 120, 121f heritage designations in, 116, 117f philanthropic value, 147, 153 Philippines, public-private partnerships in, 226 Phoenix, Arizona, heritage designations in, 119 Phoenix Park (Dublin), 9
Pine Ridge Reservation (U.S.), 238 Piotrowski, John, 183 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, heritage designations in, 119 Poland, brownfi eld redevelopment in, 235–36 policy environment, 58–64 fi scal incentives, 62–64, 63–64b for heritage designations, 111–12, 126–27 for housing, 135 monetary analysis and, 83 regulatory environment, 59–62, 59b spatial analysis and, 280 for tourism, 185 Political Risk Services, 193 Pomerania, Poland, brownfi eld redevelopment in, 235–36 Popcap, 12 Porto Vivo (Portugal), 226 Poverty and Social Impact Assessments (PSIAs), 40–41 PPIAF (Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility), 226 PPI (Private Participation in Infrastructure) Project database, 226 Praça Victor Civita (São Paulo, Brazil), 229–30 precautionary principle, 48–49 preservation easements, 37–38 framework for, 77 policy environment for, 58 preventive maintenance, 48, 60, 112 Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Project database, 226 private sector brownfi eld redevelopment and, 217–22, 218f, 220f decentralized profi t maximization and, 35 demolition decisions, 27–28, 29f, 36 fi nancing by, 168 governance and, 160b heritage designations and, 122, 125 housing policies and, 135 impact investment funds and, 237 resource allocation and, 151–52 returns for, 20–21 socially optimal preservation and, 31 urban upgrading, 17, 24–28, 27f PROFUTURO project (Honduras), 55b property reclamation, 39–40, 41 INDEX ■ 293 property rights atomistic approach to, 17 heritage designations and, 109 local residents vs. outside investors, 41–42 urban upgrading and, 40–42 property taxes, 113, 129, 140n7, 180n4 property values, 107–42 in environmental economics approach, 23 gentrifi cation and, 130–34 heritage designation and, 109–12, 115–25, 117–21f, 123b, 124f land value fi nance (LVF), 217, 230–33 low-income households and, 128–34 measurement of, 112–15 mitigation strategies, 135–38, 137b premiums on heritage properties, 125–28, 126–27b regulatory environment and, 37 spatial analysis for, 254–58 in urban economics approach, 23 proximity characteristics, 125–26 PSIAs (Poverty and Social Impact Assessments), 40–41 public capital goods, 81 public housing, 135 Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF), 226 public-private partnerships for brownfi eld redevelopment, 217, 226–30, 228f governance and, 180n4 spatial analysis and, 266 public sector brownfi eld redevelopment role of, 219–20, 222–26, 223b, 225t, 239 conservation plans and, 161 fi scal incentives and, 62–64 heritage designations and, 122, 125 regulations. See regulatory environment resource allocation and, 150–51 spatial analysis and, 265–66 urban upgrading rationale for, 34–36 Punjab Municipal Services Improvement Project (Pakistan), 259b Punjab Urban Development Project (Pakistan), 223b Q Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), 58 quasi-option demand, 82
Page 1:
Public Disclosure Authorized Public
Page 4 and 5:
Th e Urban Development Series discu
Page 6 and 7:
© 2012 International Bank for Reco
Page 8 and 9:
vi ■ CONTENTS Project Appraisal i
Page 10 and 11:
viii ■ CONTENTS Appendix II: Addi
Page 12 and 13:
x ■ CONTENTS 7.4 Tourism Is Coupl
Page 14 and 15:
xii ■ CONTENTS 9.1 How to Organiz
Page 17 and 18:
Exegi monumentum aere perennius reg
Page 19:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ■ xvii Cultural O
Page 22 and 23:
xx ■ OVERVIEW What Are the Object
Page 24 and 25:
xxii ■ OVERVIEW and captures the
Page 26 and 27:
xxiv ■ OVERVIEW periphery, especi
Page 28 and 29:
xxvi ■ OVERVIEW tourism—by impr
Page 30 and 31:
xxviii ■ OVERVIEW 3. Institutiona
Page 33 and 34:
1 Livable Historic City Cores and E
Page 35 and 36:
LIVABLE HISTORIC CITY CORES AND ENA
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
2 Investing in the Sense of Place:
Page 49 and 50:
INVESTING IN THE SENSE OF PLACE ■
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
0 45° INVESTING IN THE SENSE OF PL
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
FIGURE 2.4 continued INVESTING IN T
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
A Dubious Alternative: Property Rec
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75:
Page 78 and 79:
46 ■ THE ECONOMICS OF UNIQUENESS
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
TABLE 4.1 Overview of Hedonic Price
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
FIGURE 6.5 Quito and Oaxaca: Timeli
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
TABLE 6.5 Quito Investments in the
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 215 and 216:
7 UNESCO World Heritage List, Touri
Page 217 and 218:
UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST, TOURISM
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
TABLE 7.1 Regional and Historical D
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
TABLE 7.3 Benchmark Regressions Fir
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
TABLE 7.10 Robustness to Using Diff
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
8 Financial Mechanisms for Historic
Page 247 and 248:
FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HISTORIC C
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BOX 8.2 FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HI
Page 255 and 256:
BOX 8.3 FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HI
Page 257 and 258:
TABLE 8.1 Local Financial Tools Use
Page 259 and 260:
FIGURE 8.4 Brownfi eld Concession T
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274: FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HISTORIC C
Page 275: FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR HISTORIC C
Page 278 and 279: 246 ■ THE ECONOMICS OF UNIQUENESS
Page 317 and 318: Boxes, fi gures, maps, notes, and t
Page 319 and 320: China. See also specifi c cities ac
Page 321 and 322: public sector role, 222-26, 223b, 2
Page 323: Kraay, A., 198 Kratz, C. G., 96 L l
Page 327 and 328: Shaoxing, China, local residents re
Page 329 and 330: urban economics appraisal approach,
Page 332: ECO-AUDIT Environmental Benefits St
show all

ECONOMICS UNIQUENESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?