Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
available evidence suggests that <strong>in</strong>dividual consumers do not often use this <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
(yet) to select better-perform<strong>in</strong>g providers over those perform<strong>in</strong>g less well (see, for<br />
example, Faber et al. (63)), but that publicly releas<strong>in</strong>g performance data stimulates<br />
quality improvement activity at hospital level. Improvement of publicly released<br />
performance scores have also been demonstrated for the CQI <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands (64).<br />
Results of screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong> experience questionnaires<br />
Questions have been identified on:<br />
» the occurrence of adverse events as reported by <strong>patient</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>patient</strong> experience<br />
questionnaires;<br />
» the occurrence of factors that are known to contribute to or to prevent adverse<br />
events (<strong>safety</strong> management);<br />
» <strong>safety</strong> as an experience (trust; the concept of “feel<strong>in</strong>g safe”); and<br />
» actual <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>safety</strong> management.<br />
CAHPS surveys <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />
The CAHPS programme is a public–private <strong>in</strong>itiative to develop standardized surveys of<br />
<strong>patient</strong>s’ experiences with ambulatory and <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> facility-level <strong>care</strong>. CAHPS results<br />
are used to assess the <strong>patient</strong> centredness of <strong>care</strong>, to compare and report on performance,<br />
and to improve the quality of <strong>care</strong> (65).<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g surveys have been reviewed for this study:<br />
» CAHPS Health Plan Survey, which asks enrolees about their recent experiences<br />
with <strong>health</strong> plans and their services;<br />
» CAHPS Cl<strong>in</strong>ician and Group Survey, about recent experiences with physicians and<br />
their staff;<br />
» CAHPS Surgical Care Survey, about surgical <strong>care</strong>, surgeons, their staff and<br />
anaesthetists;<br />
» CAHPS Hospital Survey, about experiences with <strong>in</strong><strong>patient</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong> medical, surgical<br />
or obstetrics departments;<br />
» CAHPS In-centre Haemodialysis survey, about experiences with haemodialysis;<br />
» CAHPS nurs<strong>in</strong>g home surveys, which <strong>in</strong>clude three separate <strong>in</strong>struments – a<br />
personal structured <strong>in</strong>terview for long-term residents, a postal questionnaire for<br />
recently discharged short-stay residents and a postal questionnaire for residents’<br />
family members; and<br />
» CAHPS Item Set for Address<strong>in</strong>g Health Literacy.<br />
The Health Plan Survey, Cl<strong>in</strong>ician and Group Survey (adult specialty <strong>care</strong> and adult<br />
primary <strong>care</strong>) and the Item Set for Address<strong>in</strong>g Health Literacy do not <strong>in</strong>clude items<br />
that are <strong>related</strong> to <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong>. Items relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>safety</strong> are found <strong>in</strong> the In-centre<br />
Haemodialysis Survey, the Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Home Survey and the Surgical Care Survey.<br />
Items <strong>related</strong> to <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong> the CAHPS In-centre Haemodialysis Survey<br />
“In the last three months, how often did dialysis center staff check you as closely as you<br />
wanted while you were on the dialysis mach<strong>in</strong>e?”<br />
Patients’ experiences and <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong><br />
125