Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The right to participate <strong>in</strong> policy-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
It is broadly acknowledged that <strong>patient</strong>s (or their organizations or representatives) should<br />
take part <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>health</strong> policies at all levels (national, regional and local). Patientcentred<br />
<strong>care</strong> can only be achieved if <strong>patient</strong>s’ views and experiences, along with other<br />
relevant sources of <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>fluence policy-mak<strong>in</strong>g. Recommendation 2 of the<br />
European Council recommendation on <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong> stipulates that <strong>patient</strong> organizations<br />
and representatives should be <strong>in</strong>volved “<strong>in</strong> the development of policies and programmes<br />
on <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong> at all appropriate levels” (7). There are many ways to realize this, vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from consult<strong>in</strong>g national <strong>patient</strong> organizations on policy issues to creat<strong>in</strong>g a legislative<br />
basis for clients’ councils <strong>in</strong> <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions (for more details, see (25)).<br />
Clearly, this right has an overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g collective dimension. It implies that<br />
governments and <strong>health</strong> authorities stimulate and facilitate the establishment of<br />
well-<strong>in</strong>formed <strong>patient</strong> groups and organizations. At <strong>patient</strong> level, it is important that<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals are free to participate <strong>in</strong> representative bodies and organizations and are<br />
supported if necessary to develop the relevant skills and competences.<br />
The right to <strong>in</strong>formation about the <strong>safety</strong> and quality of <strong>health</strong> services<br />
If circumstances allow citizens to make a choice between providers of <strong>health</strong> services,<br />
it is important that <strong>in</strong>formation about the <strong>safety</strong> and quality of the services rendered is<br />
available. The right to <strong>in</strong>formation about the <strong>safety</strong> and quality of <strong>health</strong> services has<br />
emerged as a consequence, allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong>s to choose the service provider that meets<br />
their wishes: this is especially relevant <strong>in</strong> market-orientated <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> systems.<br />
This can be seen as an <strong>in</strong>dividual right, but collect<strong>in</strong>g the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation (through,<br />
for <strong>in</strong>stance, performance <strong>in</strong>dicators) can best be realized at collective level. Health<br />
service providers must def<strong>in</strong>e the data available, which should be valid, comparable and<br />
accessible through web sites, annual reports or other sources.<br />
This right has a clear connection with the right to safe and good-quality <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>,<br />
which cannot be fully exercised <strong>in</strong> the absence of relevant <strong>in</strong>formation. The implication<br />
is that <strong>health</strong> service providers must be transparent and accountable for the <strong>safety</strong> and<br />
quality of their services. The right is relevant at national and <strong>in</strong>ternational levels due<br />
to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong> mobility and crossborder <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Section 20 of the European<br />
Parliament and Council directive of March 2011 on the application of <strong>patient</strong>s’ rights <strong>in</strong><br />
crossborder <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> (26) stipulates:<br />
In order to help <strong>patient</strong>s to make an <strong>in</strong>formed choice when they seek to receive <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
another Member State, Member States of treatment should ensure that <strong>patient</strong>s from other<br />
Member States receive on request the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>safety</strong> and quality standards<br />
enforced on its territory as well as on which <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers are subject to these standards.<br />
Furthermore, <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers should provide <strong>patient</strong>s on request with <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
specific aspects of the <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> services they offer and on the treatment options.<br />
The right to <strong>in</strong>formation on proposed treatment (<strong>in</strong>formed consent)<br />
The right to be <strong>in</strong>formed about proposed treatment is one of the most crucial <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
<strong>patient</strong>s’ rights (see, for example, (27)) (28). Valid <strong>in</strong>formed consent for a medical<br />
Patients’ rights and <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong><br />
17