Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>patient</strong> <strong>participation</strong> <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>health</strong>-<strong>care</strong>-<strong>related</strong> <strong>safety</strong> <strong>risks</strong><br />
168<br />
Key objectives<br />
The objectives of the European HANDOVER research collaborative were to:<br />
a) identify the barriers and facilitators <strong>in</strong> the medical, social and technological contexts<br />
<strong>in</strong> which <strong>patient</strong> handover takes place;<br />
b) identify key strategies and tactics for reduc<strong>in</strong>g readmissions that could be applied<br />
across Europe;<br />
c) understand actionable strategies for engag<strong>in</strong>g community organizations across the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uum of <strong>care</strong>;<br />
d) strengthen <strong>patient</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement and understand<strong>in</strong>g of their <strong>care</strong>;<br />
e) develop and assess tools and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes for implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong><br />
handover tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; and<br />
f ) assess the cost–effectiveness of handover <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the HANDOVER study<br />
1 . A systematic qualitative multimodel study us<strong>in</strong>g content analysis was performed<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g grounded theory of hospital and primary <strong>care</strong> physicians and nurses, <strong>patient</strong>s<br />
and <strong>care</strong>givers <strong>in</strong> five countries. One hundred and n<strong>in</strong>ety-two <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
and 26 focus group <strong>in</strong>terviews were conducted <strong>in</strong> five EU countries with <strong>patient</strong>s or<br />
<strong>care</strong>givers, hospital physicians, hospital nurses, GPs and community nurses.<br />
2 . Cl<strong>in</strong>ical foci: to properly address the <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uum, several cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
conditions which represent the entire cha<strong>in</strong> of <strong>care</strong> (primary <strong>care</strong> – referral –<br />
hospital – discharge – after<strong>care</strong> by primary <strong>care</strong> physician) were identified. These<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude chronic illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease, asthma, chronic obstructive<br />
pulmonary disease and polypharmacy (>6 drugs per <strong>patient</strong>).<br />
3 . Patient groups: the HANDOVER project <strong>in</strong>cluded attention to the <strong>patient</strong>s and<br />
their <strong>care</strong>rs, especially <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>care</strong> of older <strong>patient</strong>s (60+ years), and handovers<br />
of <strong>patient</strong>s with multiple conditions. In addition, attention was paid to m<strong>in</strong>ority<br />
groups such as people with communication problems due to language barriers<br />
and/or hear<strong>in</strong>g/sight impairments. For example, the project <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> focused on<br />
communication challenges with non-Spanish-speak<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>orities and how to<br />
address their crossborder <strong>care</strong> needs.<br />
4 . Microsystems: HANDOVER used the cl<strong>in</strong>ical microsystem at the primary<br />
<strong>care</strong>−hospital <strong>in</strong>terface as the unit of analysis.<br />
5 . Applied quality improvement methods: the prospective, multimodel study was<br />
conducted apply<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated quality improvement tools such as process maps,<br />
surveys, <strong>in</strong>terviews, focus groups, observations, artefact analyses and Ishikawa<br />
diagrams to directly assess <strong>patient</strong> handovers and shadow physicians and nurses<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong> handovers.<br />
What has been learned as a result of the <strong>in</strong>itiative?<br />
While the prevail<strong>in</strong>g handover practices differ across Europe, many of the identified<br />
referral and discharge barriers and facilitators appear to be similar <strong>in</strong> the different<br />
countries and sett<strong>in</strong>gs. The key themes underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the barriers and facilitators for<br />
<strong>patient</strong> discharge and referrals that emerged from the analysis <strong>in</strong>clude: communication<br />
content, process, tools; attitudes; organizational factors; community resources; <strong>patient</strong><br />
awareness; and <strong>patient</strong> empowerment.