Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>patient</strong> <strong>participation</strong> <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>health</strong>-<strong>care</strong>-<strong>related</strong> <strong>safety</strong> <strong>risks</strong><br />
148<br />
they do not rout<strong>in</strong>ely engage <strong>patient</strong>s <strong>in</strong> discussions and decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g (see Chapter<br />
2). Even tasks that seem rather straightforward at first glance, such as mark<strong>in</strong>g a surgical<br />
site, appear to be difficult for some <strong>patient</strong>s. It should be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, therefore, that<br />
<strong>patient</strong>s are at their most vulnerable and least assertive <strong>in</strong> the acute <strong>in</strong><strong>patient</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g (see<br />
Chapter 7). Very few studies to date have provided <strong>in</strong>formation on the profile of <strong>patient</strong>s<br />
who are will<strong>in</strong>g to participate (Chapter 4).<br />
Self-management<br />
Patient <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong><strong>patient</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g is first and foremost the responsibility of<br />
professionals, although examples describ<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>patient</strong>s can be <strong>in</strong>volved as coproducers<br />
of safe <strong>care</strong> are given <strong>in</strong> this report. Patient <strong>in</strong>volvement is crucial. Patients <strong>in</strong><br />
ambulatory <strong>care</strong> are expected to adhere to medication regimes and <strong>in</strong>structions about<br />
self-<strong>care</strong> without the constant presence of a <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> professional. They or their family<br />
members must assume responsibility for their own “quality control” (see Chapter 7).<br />
They need comprehensive <strong>in</strong>formation, backed by scientific knowledge, to assume that<br />
role, because adherence to medication <strong>in</strong>structions among chronically ill <strong>patient</strong>s (for<br />
example) is <strong>related</strong> to <strong>health</strong> literacy. The <strong>patient</strong> survey described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5 revealed<br />
that 65% of <strong>patient</strong>s surveyed took more than five medic<strong>in</strong>es every day, but that only<br />
39% knew the names and dosages of the medic<strong>in</strong>es they took. Knowledge of medic<strong>in</strong>es’<br />
names and dosages appeared to decrease with the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number taken.<br />
Although the relationship between self-management, adherence to medication<br />
<strong>in</strong>structions and literacy is well known, it is difficult to develop tools to address the<br />
associated problems. Recommendations on <strong>patient</strong>s’ <strong>health</strong> education are presented <strong>in</strong><br />
several chapters (Box 8.4).<br />
The most promis<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ation of approaches is probably to work not only on<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>patient</strong>s’ <strong>health</strong> literacy, but also to address the “<strong>patient</strong> literacy” of <strong>health</strong><br />
<strong>care</strong> professionals. There is a need to improve <strong>health</strong> professionals’ communication and<br />
listen<strong>in</strong>g skills. Patients can provide feedback on doctors’ communication skills (see<br />
Chapter 7). It may be useful to monitor professionals’ efforts to empower <strong>patient</strong>s and to<br />
improve <strong>patient</strong>s’ self-management skills through surveys such as the CAHPS Health<br />
Literacy Item Set or the Patient Activation Measure. Studies <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the latter have<br />
shown that chronically ill <strong>patient</strong>s’ activation levels can be improved and that this leads<br />
to better self-management (see Chapter 7).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Milestones – set by European legislation – recommend that Member States promote<br />
and emphasize the role of <strong>patient</strong>s to improve quality and <strong>safety</strong> of <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> (3−5).<br />
These are complemented by the dedicated World Health Assembly resolutions and<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous work of the WHO Patient Safety Programme, particularly through its work<br />
on “Patients for Patient Safety”, and supported by the new WHO European <strong>health</strong><br />
policy framework (6).<br />
The studies presented <strong>in</strong> this report show that <strong>patient</strong> <strong>safety</strong> and <strong>patient</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />
need to be addressed at different levels and from different perspectives. However,<br />
there is as yet limited evidence for the effectiveness of <strong>patient</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>safety</strong>