Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks 140 69. Damman OC et al. CQ-index mammacare: Meetinstrumentontwikkeling [CQ-index breast cancer care: instrument development]. Utrecht, NIVEL, 2007 (http://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/CQ-index-Mammacaremeetinstrumentontwikkeling.pdf, accessed 1 May 2012). 70. Miletus S. Beleidsrapportage CQI Heup-/knieoperatie 2009 [Policy report CQI hip/ knee surgery 2009]. Zeist, Miletus Foundation, 2009. 71. Miletus S. Beleidsrapportage CQI Staaroperatie 2008 [Policy report CQI cataract surgery 2008]. Zeist, Miletus Foundation, 2008. 72. Miletus S. Beleidsrapportage CQI Ziekenhuisopname 2009 [Policy report CQI inpatient hospital care]. Zeist, Miletus Foundation, 2009. 73. Westert GP et al. Dutch health care performance report 2010. Bilthoven, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2010. 74. Press releases [web site]. London, Care Quality Commission, 2011 (http://www. cqc.org.uk/publications.cfm?fde_id=18163, accessed 1 May 2012). 75. Published statistics about the experience of NHS patients [web site]. London, Department of Health, 2012 (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ PublishedSurvey/NationalsurveyofNHSpatients/index.htm, accessed 1 May 2012). 76. Cheung KC, Bouvy ML, De Smet PA. Medication errors: the importance of safe dispensing. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009, 67(6):676–680. 77. Van Hulten R et al. Communication with patients who are dispensed a first prescription of chronic medication in the community pharmacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011, 83(3):417–422. 78. Van Geffen EC et al. Patients’ satisfaction with information and experiences with counseling on cardiovascular medication received at the pharmacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011, 83(3):303–309. 79. Kwint HF et al. Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems: a pragmatic randomized controlled study. Drugs and Aging, 2011, 28(4):305–314. 80. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Quality and Safety, 2011, 20(Suppl. 1):18–23. 81. Øvretveit J. A framework for quality improvement translation:understanding the conditionality of interventions. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety/Joint Commission Resources, 2004 (Global supplement):15–24. 82. Damman OC et al. Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery? Medical Decision Making, 2012, 32(2):287−300 (http:// nvl002.nivel.nl/postprint/ppPP3832.pdf, accessed 12 May 2012). 83. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson LS, IOM Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human – building a safer health system. Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, 2000. 84. Christiaans-Dingelhoff I et al. To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports? BMC Health Services Research, 2011, 11:49. 85. Watt I. A review of strategies to promote patient involvement, a study to explore patient’s views and attitudes and a pilot study to evaluate the acceptability of selected patient involvement strategies. Bradford, Bradford Institute for Health Research,
2009 (http://www.bradfordresearch.nhs.uk/our-research/patient-safety/ research-projects-1/patient-involvement-1/a-review-of-strategies-to-promoteinvolvement-a-study-to-explore-patients-views-and-attitudes-and-a-pilot-studyto-evaluate-the-acceptability-of-selected-patient-involvement-strategies, accessed 1 May 2012). 86. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs. Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Journal of the American Health Association, 1999, 281(6):552–557 (http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.asp x?volume=281&issue=6&page=552, accessed 1 May 2012). 87. Apfel F et al. Health literacy: action and guide part 2: evidence and case studies. Axbridge, World Health Commication Associates Ltd, 2010. 88. Morris NS et al. Prevalence of limited health literacy and compensatory strategies used by hospitalized patients. Nursing Research, 2011, 60(5):361–366. 89. Wolf MS, Cooper Bailey S. The role of health literacy in patient safety. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 (AHRQ WebM&M Perspectives on Safety series, February/March; http://webmm.ahrq.gov/ perspective.aspx?perspectiveID=72, accessed 1 May 2012). 90. Schiffman SM et al. Consumer understanding of prescription drug information: an illustration using an antidepressant medication. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2011, 45(4):452–458. 91. Schillinger D et al. Language, literacy, and medication compliance. Advances in Patient Safety, 2007, 2:555–567. 92. Bensing JM et al. How to make the medical consultation more successful from a patient’s perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011, 84(3):287–293. 93. CAHPS item set for addressing health literacy [web site]. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2011 (https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/content/ products/HL/PROD_HL_Intro.asp?p=1021&s=215, accessed 1 May 2012). 94. Hibbard JH, Tusler M. Assessing activation stage and employing a “next steps” approach to supporting patient self-management. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 2007, 30(1):2–8. 95. Hibbard JH et al. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 2004, 39(4 Part 1):1005–1026. 96. Hibbard JH et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research, 2005, 40(6 Part 1):1918–1930. 97. Hibbard JH et al. Do increases in patient activation result in improved selfmanagement behaviors? Health Services Research, 2007, 42(4):1443–1463. 98. Hibbard JH, Mahoney E. Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010, 78(3):377–381. 99. Green CA et al. Development of the patient activation measure for mental health. Administration Policy in Mental Health, 2010, 37(4):327–333. 100. Klein DJ et al. Understanding nonresponse to the 2007 Medicare CAHPS survey. The Gerontologist, 2011, 51(6):843−855. 101. King A et al. Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events. BMJ Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2010, 19(2):148–157. Patients’ experiences and patient safety 141
Page 1 and 2:
Exploring patient participation in
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT Patients’ rights have be
Page 5 and 6:
iv Patient information: the link be
Page 7 and 8:
vi LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXE
Page 9 and 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The editors would
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ABHR alcohol-
Page 13 and 14:
FOREWORD Health is a social value a
Page 15 and 16:
ChApTER 1. pATIENTS’ RIGhTS AND p
Page 17 and 18:
Box 1 .1 . contd Reporting and Lear
Page 19 and 20:
The causal mechanisms through which
Page 21 and 22:
» be involved in routine monitorin
Page 23 and 24:
elationships within the complex env
Page 25 and 26:
ChApTER 2. pATIENTS’ RIGhTS AND p
Page 27 and 28:
CoE Recommendation 2006/7 of the Co
Page 29 and 30:
The 2005 United States act on patie
Page 31 and 32:
The right to participate in policy-
Page 33 and 34:
The right to participate in quality
Page 35 and 36:
» engaging with patient representa
Page 37 and 38:
hampered by the written and spoken
Page 39 and 40:
prevents misunderstandings and shap
Page 41 and 42:
Health care providers should nevert
Page 43 and 44:
Recommendation 7 - Encourage the av
Page 45 and 46:
20. Constitution of the World Healt
Page 47 and 48:
ChApTER 3. pATIENT pARTICIpATION IN
Page 49 and 50:
awareness of the sociomedical burde
Page 51 and 52:
Patient participation in hand hygie
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Blood transfusion safety in France:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Box 4 .1 . Definitions of adverse e
Page 67 and 68:
Fig . 4 .4 . Distribution of advers
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
The heterogeneity of situations and
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Fig . 4 .12 . Patients’ response
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Patient safety, rights and medicati
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Fig . 5 .3 . Frequency with which d
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104: Patient safety, rights and medicati
Page 105 and 106: Patient safety, rights and medicati
Page 107 and 108: ChApTER 6. pATIENT pARTICIpATION IN
Page 109 and 110: Patient participation in elective s
Page 111 and 112: e desirable to have a special statu
Page 117 and 118: inspections of surgical services to
Page 133 and 134: » being involved in monitoring and
Page 135 and 136: Other studies on patient attitudes
Page 137 and 138: Information about patients’ exper
Page 139 and 140: available evidence suggests that in
Page 141 and 142: Adverse events Respondents from the
Page 143 and 144: Feeling safe Five per cent of hospi
Page 145 and 146: probability proportional to populat
Page 147 and 148: care professionals’ and patients
Page 149 and 150: group recommends that patient invol
Page 151 and 152: 13. Hibbard JH et al. Can patients
Page 153: 52. Triemstra M et al. Measuring cl
Page 157 and 158: of a small-scale patient survey add
Page 159 and 160: Box 8 .2 . Curricula and CME Chapte
Page 161 and 162: is provided through interaction of
Page 163 and 164: Box 8 .4 . Patient education Chapte
Page 165 and 166: ANNEX 1. QUOTATIONS FROM INTERNATIO
Page 167 and 168: (2) When designing adverse event re
Page 169 and 170: 17) If yes, do you think this was m
Page 171 and 172: Box A3 .1 . Reporting procedure Pat
Page 173 and 174: Box A3 .2 . contd Haemosiderosis Ha
Page 175 and 176: ANNEX 4. pATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE ABOU
Page 177 and 178: ANNEX 6. WhO pATIENT SAFETY pROGRAM
Page 179 and 180: especially those in intensive care.
Page 181 and 182: ANNEX 7. hANDOVER pROjECT Paul Bara
Page 183 and 184: (a) Provide new insight into the ro
Page 185 and 186: Johnson J, Barach P. Handovers of p
Page 187 and 188: Enhancing the patients’ role in p
Page 189 and 190: Enhancing the patients’ role in p
show all

Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?