05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interest-Based Regime Analysis 93<br />

candid<strong>at</strong>e for global agreement in Stockholm and advoc<strong>at</strong>ed agreement in<br />

this area <strong>at</strong> meetings with the Prepar<strong>at</strong>ory Committee. 12 The secretari<strong>at</strong> was<br />

searching for problems which governments collectively could start addressing<br />

by establishing a global regime. Although land-based sources of marine<br />

pollution (rivers, pipelines, outfalls, and runoff) supposedly accounted for<br />

as much as 90 percent of marine pollution, insufficient knowledge about<br />

these sources and much higher economic costs associ<strong>at</strong>ed with their control<br />

made land-based marine pollution a very unlikely candid<strong>at</strong>e for intern<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

regul<strong>at</strong>ion. Scientific evidence of pollution from ocean dumping<br />

also made this issue easier to tackle. Since oil pollution from ships would<br />

be dealt with <strong>at</strong> an Intergovernmental Maritime Consult<strong>at</strong>ive Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

conference in 1973, dumping was left as the “last key maritime source” of<br />

ocean pollution. The secretari<strong>at</strong> thus saw the possibility to “close off one<br />

remaining source” and in this way demonstr<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> governments were able<br />

and willing to act (interview, Peter S. Thacher, August 14, 1991).<br />

To help negoti<strong>at</strong>ions on the global ocean dumping convention, the secretari<strong>at</strong><br />

introduced the notion, innov<strong>at</strong>ed by lawyers and scientists within<br />

the United N<strong>at</strong>ions, th<strong>at</strong> substances could be classified into so-called black<br />

and gray lists by an intern<strong>at</strong>ional convention (interviews, Sachiko<br />

Kuwabara, August 26 and 27, 1991). According to this notion, dumping<br />

of blacklisted substances should be prohibited and special care should be<br />

taken and permission should be given before graylisted substances were<br />

dumped. 13 The secretari<strong>at</strong> recognized th<strong>at</strong> c<strong>at</strong>egorizing substances on the<br />

basis of available knowledge of their environmental impact in separ<strong>at</strong>e lists<br />

annexed to the convention had several advantages. For one, the contents<br />

of the lists could be upd<strong>at</strong>ed and adjusted as new knowledge of pollutants<br />

developed without it being necessary to negoti<strong>at</strong>e the entire convention<br />

text. This alone would mean a major innov<strong>at</strong>ion of the standard tre<strong>at</strong>y<br />

form. 14<br />

Recent experiences showed th<strong>at</strong> lack of knowledge about pollutants was<br />

a significant barrier to intern<strong>at</strong>ional agreement. 15 The system of black and<br />

gray lists also offered a solution to this problem in th<strong>at</strong> the lack of complete<br />

knowledge concerning the effects of pollutants on the marine environment<br />

could be acknowledged without jeopardizing agreement. As one U.S. deleg<strong>at</strong>e<br />

to the negoti<strong>at</strong>ions l<strong>at</strong>er described, this approach helped significantly<br />

in overcoming this particular obstacle to agreement: “There was very little<br />

disagreement over the scientific portions of the Convention. All accepted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!