05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes to pp. 52–61 205<br />

49. See Russett and Sullivan 1971, pp. 853–854.<br />

50. The liter<strong>at</strong>ure on how perception and misperception <strong>at</strong> the level of individuals<br />

and groups influence foreign policy making is not included in the reflective group.<br />

See, e.g., Jervis 1976; Steinbruner 1974.<br />

51. More recently, E. Haas (1990, p. 12) has concluded th<strong>at</strong> “when knowledge<br />

becomes consensual, we ought to expect politicians to use it in helping them define<br />

their interests.”<br />

52. P. Haas (1990b, p. 349) claims th<strong>at</strong> environmental regime form<strong>at</strong>ion is not<br />

dependent upon st<strong>at</strong>es, even prominent ones, providing leadership.<br />

53. For an example of how ideological differences among decision makers m<strong>at</strong>ter,<br />

see Odell 1982, p. 358.<br />

54. See, e.g., Ruggie 1983, pp. 195–231.<br />

55. See also Haggard and Simmons 1987, pp. 509–513.<br />

56. E. Haas (1990, p. 42) concludes th<strong>at</strong> “the success of an epistemic community<br />

thus depends on two fe<strong>at</strong>ures: (1) the claim to truth being advanced must be more<br />

persuasive to the dominant political decision makers than some other claim, and (2)<br />

a successful alliance must be made with the dominant political coalition. . . . Epistemic<br />

communities seek to monopolize access to str<strong>at</strong>egic decision-making positions.”<br />

57. It seems beyond doubt th<strong>at</strong> Cousteau framed this regional environmental problem<br />

and <strong>at</strong>tracted <strong>at</strong>tention to it. In the words of the first editor of the scientific journal<br />

Marine Pollution Bulletin: “Twenty years ago, the Mediterranean had a<br />

thoroughly bad reput<strong>at</strong>ion for its polluted w<strong>at</strong>ers. Jacques Cousteau could say th<strong>at</strong><br />

the Mediterranean was 90% dead and, wh<strong>at</strong>ever th<strong>at</strong> might have meant, it highlighted<br />

an undoubtedly serious st<strong>at</strong>e of affairs. . . . In these circumstances, the<br />

Mediterranean was an obvious target for <strong>at</strong>tention by the United N<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Environmental Programme under its Regional <strong>Sea</strong>s Programme.” (Clark 1989b,<br />

pp. 369–370)<br />

58. On the intern<strong>at</strong>ional political impact of the 1967 Torrey Canyon oil spill<br />

between France and Britain, see M’Gonigle and Zacher 1979, pp. 143–147. On the<br />

impact of the discovery of a seasonally depleted ozone layer over Antarctica, see<br />

Litfin 1994. On the impact of Chernobyl on regul<strong>at</strong>ory approaches, see Liber<strong>at</strong>ore<br />

1999.<br />

Chapter 4<br />

1. For a brief account of the asbestos case, see Sapolsky 1990, pp. 83–96. For a<br />

critical account of government regul<strong>at</strong>ion of the insecticide DDT, see Wildavsky<br />

1997, pp. 55–80.<br />

2. For a study of nuclear fears over time, see Weart 1988.<br />

3. For an early article on the pollution of Lake Erie, see Powers and Robertson 1966.<br />

According to Hasler and Ingersoll (1968, p. 153), “it took the visual (and olfactory)<br />

impact of a huge body of w<strong>at</strong>er, Lake Erie, suffoc<strong>at</strong>ing as a sump for industrial waste,<br />

sewage, and urban and rural runoff to bring the problem of w<strong>at</strong>er pollution dram<strong>at</strong>ically<br />

to the public eye,” and “some now pronounce Lake Erie ‘dead.’”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!