Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Changing the Global Ocean Dumping Regime 143<br />
their safety when handling the waste, 41 passed a resolution in favor of halting<br />
ocean dumping of radioactive m<strong>at</strong>erials (“Four Unions Back Ban on A-<br />
<strong>Waste</strong> Dumping,” Guardian, April 7, 1983). 42 A month l<strong>at</strong>er, the opposition<br />
was further strengthened when the Transport and General Workers’ Union,<br />
the train drivers’ union known as ASLEF, and the N<strong>at</strong>ional Union of<br />
Railwaymen, <strong>at</strong> a meeting organized by Greenpeace, agreed on an <strong>at</strong>tempt<br />
to halt ocean dumping of radioactive waste. 43 In June of the same year, the<br />
British seamen announced a ban on handling the waste. The seamen refused<br />
to crew a “Greenpeace-proof” ship (fitted with a hole in the hull through<br />
which drums of waste could be dropped) th<strong>at</strong> had been chartered by Britain,<br />
Belgium, and Switzerland to carry out dumping (Pearce 1983). 44 The<br />
Transport and General Workers’ Union and ASLEF similarly called on their<br />
members not to handle or transport the waste. Transport union boycotts<br />
were also called in Switzerland and in Belgium (Curtis 1984, p. 68). If the<br />
British government let the armed forces carry out the dumping, as the<br />
unions expected, an armada of protest vessels was expected to sail from<br />
Spain to converge on the dumping site. “We understand there are already<br />
plans for quite a lot of vessels to leave Spain,” explained an executive officer<br />
of the Transport and General Workers’ Union, “and we would hopefully<br />
form part of th<strong>at</strong> armada” (Ardill 1983). In February and July of 1983,<br />
Spanish Friends of the Earth, ecologists, and left-wing protesters demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
before the British Embassy in Madrid in protest against the plan to<br />
dump. In July, more than 150 British flags were burned in several towns<br />
and cities in Galicia, and in one city Prime Minister Margaret Th<strong>at</strong>cher was<br />
burned in effigy. 45<br />
Mounting n<strong>at</strong>ional and intern<strong>at</strong>ional pressure orchestr<strong>at</strong>ed by<br />
Greenpeace forced the British government to reverse its policy. In<br />
September, the British opposition was further strengthened when the seamen’s<br />
union won backing from the Trade Unions Congress for a motion<br />
condemning the use of the world’s oceans as a dumping ground for nuclear<br />
waste and demanding th<strong>at</strong> development of land-based disposal facilities be<br />
acceler<strong>at</strong>ed. The position of the seamen was th<strong>at</strong> “radioactive waste should<br />
not be dumped irretrievably but should be stored in above-ground, engineered<br />
facilities in a loc<strong>at</strong>ion acceptable to the local communities<br />
involved.” 46 The Trade Unions Congress furthermore urged the British government<br />
to comply with the decision made <strong>at</strong> the February meeting of the<br />
global ocean dumping regime; this decision was carried by a vote of