05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 Chapter 4<br />

(April 15, 1970), the president directed the Council on Environmental<br />

Quality to study and report on ocean disposal of solid waste. 8<br />

In October of 1970, the Council on Environmental Quality announced<br />

a n<strong>at</strong>ional policy to prevent pollution of the oceans in the future. The CEQ<br />

also recommended th<strong>at</strong> the United St<strong>at</strong>es take the initi<strong>at</strong>ive to establish<br />

intern<strong>at</strong>ional cooper<strong>at</strong>ion on ocean dumping, and th<strong>at</strong> such proposals<br />

should be presented in “intern<strong>at</strong>ional forums such as the 1972 UN<br />

Conference on the Human Environment” (CEQ 1970, p. 37). Such proposals<br />

should be made along the lines of n<strong>at</strong>ional policy. President Nixon<br />

welcomed the council’s recommend<strong>at</strong>ions and its approach of “acting<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her than reacting to prevent pollution” (Smith 1970). Sen<strong>at</strong>or and “antipolluter”<br />

Gaylord Nelson, the Sen<strong>at</strong>e’s leading authority on ocean pollution,<br />

declared: “We have the opportunity now to prevent the sea from<br />

becoming the same kind of mess we now see in our rivers.” 9 A New York<br />

Times editorial titled “To Save the <strong>Sea</strong>s” (October 13, 1970) cautioned th<strong>at</strong><br />

“if the n<strong>at</strong>ions continue to use the seas as a dump, scientists warned last<br />

summer, the world’s oceans will become as “dead” as Lake Erie by the end<br />

of this century.”<br />

In a report titled “Ocean Dumping—A N<strong>at</strong>ional Policy,” the Council<br />

on Environmental Quality urged th<strong>at</strong> strict limits be set on the wastes th<strong>at</strong><br />

until then had been dumped indiscrimin<strong>at</strong>ely into the Gre<strong>at</strong> Lakes and the<br />

oceans. On radioactive wastes, the report said: “The current policy of prohibiting<br />

ocean dumping of high-level radioactive wastes should be continued.<br />

Low-level liquid discharges to the ocean from vessels and land-based<br />

nuclear facilities are, and should continue to be, controlled by Federal regul<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

and intern<strong>at</strong>ional standards. The adequacy of such standards<br />

should be continually reviewed. Ocean dumping of other radioactive<br />

wastes should be prohibited. In a very few cases, there may be no altern<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

offering less harm to man or the environment. In these cases ocean disposal<br />

should be allowed only when the lack of altern<strong>at</strong>ives has been<br />

demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed. Planning of activities which will result in production of<br />

radioactive wastes should include provisions to avoid ocean disposal.”<br />

(CEQ 1970, pp. vi–vii)<br />

The Council on Environmental Quality’s decision was based on the anticip<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

environmental and economic consequences of future dumping. A<br />

member of the CEQ explained before a Sen<strong>at</strong>e hearing: “We think it is a<br />

serious problem today. It is potentially a very critical problem for the future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!