05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 Notes to pp. 61–64<br />

4. Barry Commoner devoted a chapter of The Closing Circle (1971) to the subject.<br />

For a rejection of Commoner’s view, see Maddox 1972. For denials of the poor condition<br />

of Lake Erie, see Grayson and Shepard 1973. Since 1972, according to mass<br />

media reports, the st<strong>at</strong>e of the Gre<strong>at</strong> Lakes seemed to be improving. See Goth 1974<br />

and Tunley 1974.<br />

5. For Nixon’s St<strong>at</strong>e of the Union message, see Congressional Quarterly: Weekly<br />

Report, January 23, 1970, pp. 245–248. See also “Nixon’s Spirit of ’76,”<br />

Newsweek, February 2, 1970; “Pollution: The B<strong>at</strong>tle Plan,” Newsweek, February<br />

23, 1970.<br />

6. Sen<strong>at</strong>or Henry Jackson had proposed a permanent three-member White House<br />

Council on Environmental Quality. It was established by a law which origin<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />

legisl<strong>at</strong>ion introduced by Represent<strong>at</strong>ive John Dingell, chairman of the House<br />

Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion. For a brief discussion of environmentalism<br />

among American presidents, see Nobile and Deedy 1972, pp.<br />

xiii–xvii.<br />

7. According to Moore (1990, p. 67) and Marcus (1980, p. 287), Nixon saw the<br />

environment issue as “phony” and “faddish.”<br />

8. For Nixon’s message to Congress on pollution of the Gre<strong>at</strong> Lakes, see “Gre<strong>at</strong><br />

Lakes Pollution,” Congressional Quarterly: Weekly Report, April 17, 1970, pp.<br />

1050–1051.<br />

9. “Don’t Go Near the W<strong>at</strong>er,” Newsweek, October 19, 1970. A few months l<strong>at</strong>er,<br />

Newsweek listed as America’s ten “filthiest” rivers the Ohio, the Houston Ship<br />

Channel, the Cuyahoga, the Rouge, the Buffalo, the Passaic, the Arthur Kill, the<br />

Merrimack, the Androscoggin, and the Escambia (“From <strong>Sea</strong> to Shining <strong>Sea</strong>,”<br />

January 26, 1970).<br />

10. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, “St<strong>at</strong>ement,” in U.S. Sen<strong>at</strong>e, Ocean <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Disposal</strong>:<br />

March 2, 3; April 15, 21, 22, and 28, 1971 (92nd Congress, 1st Session), p. 153<br />

11. See, e.g., John D. Parkhurst, “St<strong>at</strong>ement,” in U.S. Sen<strong>at</strong>e, Ocean <strong>Waste</strong><br />

<strong>Disposal</strong>: March 2, 3; April 15, 21, 22, and 28, 1971 (92nd Congress, 1st Session),<br />

1971, p. 124.<br />

12. For the brief mention in the House, see Congressional Record: House,<br />

September 8, 1971, p. 30863.<br />

13. “Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Aspects of the 1971 Environmental Program: Message from<br />

President Nixon to the Congress,” Department of St<strong>at</strong>e Bulletin, March 1, 1971, p.<br />

254.<br />

14. Ibid., p. 255. The CEQ’s recommend<strong>at</strong>ion with respect to intern<strong>at</strong>ional cooper<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

(CEQ 1970, p. v) said: “Finally, this report recognizes the intern<strong>at</strong>ional character<br />

of ocean dumping. Unil<strong>at</strong>eral action by the United St<strong>at</strong>es can deal with only a<br />

part-although an important part-of the problem. Effective intern<strong>at</strong>ional action will<br />

be necessary if damage to the marine environment from ocean dumping is to be<br />

averted.”<br />

15. “Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972,” section 109;<br />

quoted from Sen<strong>at</strong>e Report no. 451, Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries<br />

Act of 1972 (92nd Congress, 1st session) (1971), p. 4272.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!