05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 Notes to pp. 5–18<br />

12. The Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of <strong>Waste</strong>s<br />

and Other M<strong>at</strong>ter, signed in London on November 13, 1972, took effect on August<br />

30, 1975 (ILM 11 (November 1972): 1291–1314). In 1992, governments decided<br />

to change the name by which this convention was generally known from “London<br />

Dumping Convention” to “London Convention,” fearing th<strong>at</strong> the convention otherwise<br />

could be understood as sanctioning ocean dumping.<br />

13. “Nuclear Dumping Ban Voted,” Washington Post, November 13, 1993. This<br />

st<strong>at</strong>ement reflects the view of the majority of governments.<br />

14. For a discussion see Sab<strong>at</strong>ier 1991, p. 149.<br />

15. See, e.g., Hasenclever et al. 1997.<br />

16. On reflectivism, see Keohane 1988. On cognitivists, see Haggard and Simmons<br />

1987, pp. 509–513. For an influential contribution to constructivism, see Wendt<br />

1992. Constructivism may be subdivided into individual schools of thought. For<br />

instance, K<strong>at</strong>zenstein et al. (1998) distinguish conventional, critical, and postmodern<br />

constructivism.<br />

17. See Miles 1987, pp. 37–53; Spiller and Hayden 1988.<br />

18. On the influence of ideas on intern<strong>at</strong>ional cooper<strong>at</strong>ion in public health, see<br />

Cooper 1989. On the influence of ideas on macro-economic policy, see Hall 1989a.<br />

On the influence of ideas on monetary policy, see Odell 1982. On the influence of<br />

ideas on trade policy, see Goldstein 1993. On the influence of ideas on development<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egies, see Sikkink 1991. On the influence of ideas on human rights policies, see<br />

Sikkink 1993. On the influence of ideas on military str<strong>at</strong>egy, see Mueller 1993. On<br />

the influence of ideas on foreign policy, see Risse-Kappen 1994. On the influence of<br />

ideas on intern<strong>at</strong>ional political change, see Checkel 1997. On the role of ideas in the<br />

EU integr<strong>at</strong>ion process, see Risse-Kappen 1996.<br />

19. The need to examine interactions among policy elites, ideas, and society more<br />

broadly is underlined in Jacobsen 1995. See also Checkel 1997, p. 131.<br />

20. On ide<strong>at</strong>ional caus<strong>at</strong>ion, see Ruggie 1998a, pp. 16–22.<br />

21. For focusing events, see Kingdon 1984, pp. 99–105.<br />

22. It is often necessary to discover possibilities for joint gains; they do not simply<br />

“exist.” See, e.g., Sebenius 1992. See also Scharpf 1997, pp. 120–121.<br />

23. For altern<strong>at</strong>ive definitions of public diplomacy, see Kremenyuk 1991, p. 24;<br />

Fortner 1994, pp. 34–35; Dobrynin 1995, pp. 532–535.<br />

24. On process tracing and thick description, see King et al. 1994, pp. 36–41 and<br />

226–228. On process tracing in studies of the policy effects of ideas, see Yee 1996,<br />

pp. 76–78.<br />

25. My analysis draws heavily on Ringius 1997.<br />

26. See also Tannenwald 1999.<br />

27. For an analysis of the recent regime change in the Baltic <strong>Sea</strong> area, see Ringius<br />

1996, pp. 23–38.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!