Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notes to pp. 135–139 223<br />
within a short period of time. Failure by Congress to act within 30 days on a permit<br />
request results in a legisl<strong>at</strong>ive veto, resulting in a denial of the permit. The bill’s<br />
sponsors deliber<strong>at</strong>ely chose this procedure because they expected it was extremely<br />
unlikely th<strong>at</strong> Congress within so brief time could consider a permit.<br />
20. See “Navy Prefers to Bury Subs,” Science News 125 (May 26–June 9, 1984),<br />
p. 358. See also Trupp 1984, pp. 34–35.<br />
21. On the <strong>Sea</strong>bed Working Group of the NEA (OECD), see Curtis 1985 and Deese<br />
1977.<br />
22. Greenpeace has since its beginning been an anti-nuclear organiz<strong>at</strong>ion working<br />
to reduce nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons testing, and nuclear power. Its nuclearfree<br />
seas campaign has aimed <strong>at</strong> “ridding the seas of nuclear weapons” (GREEN-<br />
PEACE . . . for a cleaner, safer earth). A newsletter released in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />
Greenpeace’s campaign against radwaste disposal explained th<strong>at</strong> “a ban on dumping<br />
of radioactive waste would hasten the de<strong>at</strong>h of the nuclear industry, particularly<br />
in the U.K.” (quoted on p. 79 of Rippon 1983).<br />
23. A major intern<strong>at</strong>ional scandal followed when in 1985 the Rainbow Warrior<br />
was blown up by French agents in Auckland Harbor.<br />
24. On Greenpeace’s campaign within Britain, see Blowers et al. 1991, pp. 74–85.<br />
A good source of inform<strong>at</strong>ion is the Greenpeace documentary film Desper<strong>at</strong>e<br />
Measures, which documents the Greenpeace campaign from its beginning in 1978<br />
through 1982.<br />
25. No one was injured in the accident. See “Dutch Ship Stops Dumping Nuclear<br />
<strong>Waste</strong>,” New York Times, August 30, 1982.<br />
26. See “A Dutch Ship Resumes Dumping Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong> Off Northern Spain,”<br />
New York Times, August 31, 1982.<br />
27. Quoted on p. 427 of Wassermann 1985b.<br />
28. “Dutch to Stop Dumping Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong>s <strong>at</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>,” New York Times, September<br />
23, 1982.<br />
29. See van Weers et al. 1982, pp. 461–462.<br />
30. For a short history of the “greening” of the Netherlands, see Bennett 1991.<br />
31. See Article 15 (2).<br />
32. The London Convention originally puts the onus of proof on those wanting to<br />
halt pollution. See Article 1.<br />
33. Other Pacific Basin n<strong>at</strong>ions, such as Fiji, had chosen not to do so because they<br />
have considered the regime too lenient as demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed by Japan’s claim th<strong>at</strong> its<br />
proposed dumping was in accord with the convention. Kirib<strong>at</strong>i (the former Gilbert<br />
Islands, which gained independence from Britain in 1979) became a member of the<br />
London Convention on June 11, 1982; Nauru (a former United N<strong>at</strong>ions trust territory<br />
th<strong>at</strong> became independent in 1968) became a member on August 25, 1982.<br />
34. For the discussion, see LDC 1983a, pp. 19–30.<br />
35. See LDC 1982.