Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Conclusion 189<br />
importance of agreeing on a definition of acceptability with respect to environmental<br />
change.<br />
The system of black and gray lists, essentially the global ocean dumping<br />
regime’s approach to regul<strong>at</strong>ion, illustr<strong>at</strong>es such shortcomings. It relies<br />
heavily on the c<strong>at</strong>egoriz<strong>at</strong>ion of harmful substances as either safe or unsafe.<br />
Marine scientists, however, do not c<strong>at</strong>egorize substances in this way, as they<br />
find th<strong>at</strong> the “biological effects of toxic m<strong>at</strong>erials are a function of their<br />
concentr<strong>at</strong>ion” (Stebbing 1992, p. 290). Put more crudely, it all depends<br />
on the dose. But the black and gray lists do not take into consider<strong>at</strong>ion the<br />
aggreg<strong>at</strong>e amount or concentr<strong>at</strong>ion of wastes, the assimil<strong>at</strong>ive capacity of<br />
the receiving body of ocean w<strong>at</strong>er, various uses of the oceans (e.g. recre<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
fishing, or exploit<strong>at</strong>ion of mineral resources), or dumping periods. 24<br />
Furthermore, the convention, as one participant of early scientific working<br />
groups has noted, “give[s] no specific criteria for the inclusion of m<strong>at</strong>erials<br />
in [the black and gray lists] and . . . some of the substances were included<br />
on the basis of very little scientific evidence” (Norton 1981, p. 147). This<br />
regul<strong>at</strong>ory approach of c<strong>at</strong>egorizing substances as either safe or unsafe for<br />
regul<strong>at</strong>ory purposes must be changed if the global ocean dumping regime<br />
is to become more effective.<br />
It now seems evident th<strong>at</strong> much research is needed before marine scientists<br />
will know which contaminants can be assimil<strong>at</strong>ed, and in which quantities.<br />
Without comprehensive knowledge of the behavior of contaminants<br />
in the marine environment and their effects on humans, it will be impossible<br />
to make compar<strong>at</strong>ive risk assessments. Marine scientific research should<br />
consequently be supported. There will otherwise be no found<strong>at</strong>ion for a<br />
more informed ocean dumping policy or for improvement of the black-andgray-lists<br />
system. More knowledge will also have important implic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
for public legitimacy of policy. Since the deb<strong>at</strong>e on the concept of assimil<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
capacity presently is still evolving within the marine scientific community,<br />
the scientific basis of ocean protection policies is vulnerable to<br />
criticism. 25 A more permissive ocean dumping policy th<strong>at</strong> lacked a firm scientific<br />
found<strong>at</strong>ion would be difficult to legitimize.<br />
The science-based principle originally adopted in the London Convention<br />
indirectly encourages manipul<strong>at</strong>ion of scientific and technical issues. It in<br />
addition drives economic interests underground. It will be important to cre<strong>at</strong>e<br />
institutions for environmental protection th<strong>at</strong> will take more than the